Re: [FFmpeg-user] tools for viewing frames and results

2016-10-09 Thread Xen
Sven C. Dack schreef op 09-10-2016 1:52: Don't call the work of others "too worthless to exist". Your rudeness is uncalled for. And that's denigrating and patronizing, but so you have it. I think it hardly can be considered "the work of others" or even "a work" in the light of things, becaus

[FFmpeg-user] tools for viewing frames and results

2016-10-08 Thread Xen
Is there any way in Linux to obtain an accurate frame/time number through a GUI that can be used with ffmpeg? I know Avidemux hardly works at all, VLC will not reliably show frames. Pitivi is not an option, I haven't tried Kdenlive because it crashed the first time I used it. Haven't attempt

Re: [FFmpeg-user] on frame changes in recode

2016-04-29 Thread Xen
Nicolas George schreef op 29-04-2016 13:14: Le primidi 11 floréal, an CCXXIV, Xen a écrit : >Generally, on this mailing list, only current FFmpeg git head is >supported. Well there you get it, more nitpicking. Important reason not to give this data to people. Let me translate your m

Re: [FFmpeg-user] on frame changes in recode

2016-04-29 Thread Xen
Carl Eugen Hoyos schreef op 29-04-2016 12:34: Hi! ffmpeg version 2.8.6-1ubuntu2 Generally, on this mailing list, only current FFmpeg git head is supported. Well there you get it, more nitpicking. Important reason not to give this data to people. Example: if you go to #ubuntu (before rel

Re: [FFmpeg-user] on frame changes in recode

2016-04-29 Thread Xen
Moritz Barsnick schreef op 29-04-2016 11:02: On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 23:31:57 +0200, Xen wrote: Basically there is no other information unless you want the number of spaces typed on average every day on my system. That would be very kind of you. I can recommend some keyloggers, but ask you to

Re: [FFmpeg-user] on frame changes in recode

2016-04-29 Thread Xen
Cley Faye schreef op 29-04-2016 2:50: 2016-04-28 23:31 GMT+02:00 Xen : All of this is unnecessary, but if it makes you happy, here you have it ;P. ​I was curious about your issue, and I too was eagerly waiting for that log. Sadly it didn't come. Well I am sorry, I had CTRL-Z-

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Problem with a YT video

2016-04-29 Thread Xen
Not to nitpick either but the command I supplied and I think you improved, it allows you to play the unfinished video just fine. So in this case I don't know why the OP is still bugging. The command I provided provided exactly what he wants or wanted. And your improved version, probably exact

Re: [FFmpeg-user] on frame changes in recode

2016-04-28 Thread Xen
Moritz Barsnick schreef op 28-04-2016 13:20: On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 20:17:56 +, Xen wrote: > Only if you want support on this mailing list;-) That sounds horrendous. Why? The log contains valuable information, such as details about the input, messages regarding what ffmpeg is doing

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Problem with a YT video

2016-04-27 Thread Xen
jd1008 schreef op 27-04-2016 23:35: BUT - No Audio :( :( Mine has. Perhaps your download tool downloaded the video-only stream. (Have you checked "youtube-dl -F"?) Responding to the guy who gave you the ffplay command, but. I am no expert but this thing works: ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -f lav

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Problem with a YT video

2016-04-27 Thread Xen
jd1008 schreef op 27-04-2016 23:35: Hi Moritz, How do I use the command to save the output file instead of viewing it? Thanx!!! I haven't followed this as I just arrived on this list. But. Normally if you were downloading from a video site you'd use youtube-dl, right? Maybe I should be rea

Re: [FFmpeg-user] on frame changes in recode

2016-04-27 Thread Xen
Carl Eugen Hoyos schreef op 27-04-2016 19:56: Xen xenhideout.nl> writes: I don't know if its output is important. Only if you want support on this mailing list;-) That sounds horrendous. Well I think this is about the output of the first attempt (to mp4): Output #0,

[FFmpeg-user] on frame changes in recode

2016-04-27 Thread Xen
use otherwise I won't have a starting keyframe. The frames themselves are NOT changed but the 2nd frame is duplicated. Any idea what's going on here? Picturesque: <1> <2> <3> <4> <5> <6> <7> <8> <9> <