Re: [FFmpeg-user] Using FFMPEG to encode multiple outputs in 'parallel' (doesn't work?)

Reuben Martin wrote > On Thursday, June 29, 2017 6:56:51 PM CDT shalin wrote: >> Cley Faye wrote >> >> > More to the point, as far as I know, ffmpeg will not do parallel >> treatment >> > on either input or output, as you deduced. It certainly is doable, b

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Using FFMPEG to encode multiple outputs in 'parallel' (doesn't work?)

Cley Faye wrote > More to the point, as far as I know, ffmpeg will not do parallel treatment > on either input or output, as you deduced. It certainly is doable, but > don't seem trivial to implement in the ffmpeg CLI tool itself since that > tool must handle various cases, and introducing (more) s

Re: [FFmpeg-user] Using FFMPEG to encode multiple outputs in 'parallel' (doesn't work?)

Nicolas George wrote > Hi. > > Le decadi 10 messidor, an CCXXV, Shalin Mehta a écrit : >> Option1: Run 3 instances of ffmpeg using pipe. >> ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -c:v libx264 -b:v 12M -f null - | ffmpeg -i input.mp4 >> -c:v libx264 -b:v 12M -f null - | ffmpeg -i input.m

[FFmpeg-user] Using FFMPEG to encode multiple outputs in 'parallel' (doesn't work?)

output level parallelism. Can some one explain if this is possible? Or may be, I can use some different kind of command line to achieve such output level parallelism? Shalin ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman