On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Nitish Prabhu
wrote:
>
> Won't altering the timebase for "96.out.mp4" make the "96.new.mp4" play
> slower than it was recorded at?
>
When the timescale is changed here, ffmpeg will rescale the timestamps to
maintain timing. There's a loss of precision since the t
On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Gyan wrote:
>
> Run this on 96.out.mp4
>
> ffmpeg -i 96.out.mp4 -c copy -video_track_timescale 12800 96.new.mp4
>
> and concat this with the other file.
Won't altering the timebase for "96.out.mp4" make the "96.new.mp4" play
slower than it was recorded at?
Is
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Marek Sebera wrote:
>
> Concat of the 2 videos, of lenght (00:00:21.00) and (00:00:28.03)
> results in video of lenght (00:01:54.92), which is obviously wrong.
>
>
> ffprobe of 98.out.mp4
>
> Stream #0:0(eng): Video: h264 (High) (avc1 / 0x31637661),
Hi,
I'm trying to concat 2 video files, process that worked pretty well for
us for the past few months.
Using Debian binary distribution ffmpeg (7:3.2.7-1~deb9u1) and libx264
(libx264-148:amd64 2:0.148.2748+git97eaef2-1)
Concat 2 files, ffmpeg command, ffprobe of both source files and result
fi
