On 8/17/2021 12:45 AM, Phil Rhodes via ffmpeg-user wrote:
I can't remember what the solution was, but I seem to recall that it was
something to do with the fact that ffmpeg writes most of its status
information not to standard output, but to standard error, presumably so
as to keep standard outpu
I had this problem running it under C# once. I can't remember what the
solution was, but I seem to recall that it was something to do with the fact
that ffmpeg writes most of its status information not to standard output, but
to standard error, presumably so as to keep standard output free for
Hi Jim,
I ran it without redirecting the output and it worked. I prefer writing
all the output to a log file, but if it works, that is more important in
this case.
Marc.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 10:21 PM The Admin wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Thanks for suggesting the -nostdin option. Unfortunate
Hi Jim,
Thanks for suggesting the -nostdin option. Unfortunately, it didn't work.
I am redirecting the output of the subprocess to a file on Windows log file.
*Log file highlights*
Parameters written to a file named *filter.txt *from a batch file
echo
[0]adelay=0:all=1[0a];[1]adelay=17650:al
On 2021-08-16 17:38, The Admin wrote:
Hi,
Here the command that works fine at the command prompt.
C:\progra~1\GloboTRAC\ffmpeg\bin\ffmpeg.exe -i a0.m3u8 -i a1.m3u8 -i
a2.m3u8 -filter_complex
"[0]adelay=0:all=1[0a];[1]adelay=17650:all=1[1a];[2]adelay=37510:all=1[2a];[0a][1a][2a]amix=inputs=3[
Hi,
Here the command that works fine at the command prompt.
C:\progra~1\GloboTRAC\ffmpeg\bin\ffmpeg.exe -i a0.m3u8 -i a1.m3u8 -i
a2.m3u8 -filter_complex
"[0]adelay=0:all=1[0a];[1]adelay=17650:all=1[1a];[2]adelay=37510:all=1[2a];[0a][1a][2a]amix=inputs=3[a]"
-map "[a]" -y all_audio.mp4
When I r
Not a lot of info to go on.
On 8/16/2021 1:50 PM, The Admin wrote:
Can you help me with this?
Help up by providing the complete command and complete output of what you're
trying (as the list FAQ directs). Does the command execute at all or run for
a while but not finish? Have you tried di
Hello,
I have been using your command line tool and it works fine to mix audio
files and video files. I am trying to automate the command tool using C#
and it just hangs. When I copy the command into a CMD window, it works
fine.
Specifically, I am using the amix command to combine multiple au
ears at
http://www.compression.ru/video/codec_comparison/h264_2012/
>
> Thanks and Regards ,
> Shiwnai
>
>> Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 17:19:22 +0200
>> From: barsn...@gmx.net
>> To: ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
>> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] Integration of ffmpeg with Haswell
>>
>
Hello ,
Thanks for explanation , I would certainly test the speed enhancement for my
case before paying for the license .
Thanks and Regards ,
Shiwnai
> Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 17:19:22 +0200
> From: barsn...@gmx.net
> To: ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] In
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 15:07:03 +, Shiwani Agrawal wrote:
> Thanks for helping me out in this issue , just want to clarify in the
> end , does it mean that if we integrate ffmpeg with the media SDK it
> increases the speed (or Quality) of transcoding process by processor
> ? If yes , why ?
T
:53:12 +0200
> From: barsn...@gmx.net
> To: ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] Integration of ffmpeg with Haswell
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:43:12 +0200, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> > Actually, my bad. Support is already integrated into ffmpeg. It appears
>
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:43:12 +0200, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> Actually, my bad. Support is already integrated into ffmpeg. It appears
> that, at the presence of the Media SDK (libmfx, mfx/mfxvideo.h), the
> qsv encoders and decoders are built. You will need the Media SDK, and
> you have to build
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:10:47 +0200, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> If you really have the need for testing the hardware acceleration, I
> believe you must google your way through those paths of integrating.
> Otherwise, just use plain ffmpeg.
Actually, my bad. Support is already integrated into ffmp
Hi Shiwani,
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 01:59:04 +, Shiwani Agrawal wrote:
> what I am not getting is the need for installing intel media SDK and
> then integrating ffmpeg with it . Can we install ffmpeg directly
> without having installed intel media SDK ?.
Yes, sure you can install ffmpeg witho
Hello ,
I want to integrate the haswell box with the ffmpeg to get the benefits of its
faster transcoding efficiency. I read some of the articles stating that install
intel media SDK and then integrate ffmpeg with it , what I am not getting is
the need for installing intel media SDK and then in
16 matches
Mail list logo
