Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
> On 02/12/2021 10:34 AM, pdr0 wrote:
>> Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
>
> -snip-
>
>> "72fps" or "144fps" equivalent in a cinema is not the same thing - the
>> analogy would be the cinema is repeating frames, vs interpolating new
>> in-between frames on a motion flow TV
On 02/12/2021 10:34 AM, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
-snip-
"72fps" or "144fps" equivalent in a cinema is not the same thing - the
analogy would be the cinema is repeating frames, vs interpolating new
in-between frames on a motion flow TV. ...
To some transcodes, repeating frames
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
>> Either way, cadence wise that's going to be worse in terms of smoothness
>> then an optical flow retimed 6/1001 . (Some people would argue it's
>> worse period, you're retiming it and making it look like a soap opera...)
>
> You know, I think that "soap opera" op
On 02/12/2021 04:49 AM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 9:36 AM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
wrote:
On 02/12/2021 02:48 AM, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
On 02/12/2021 02:28 AM, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
On 02/12/2021 01:27 AM, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 9:36 AM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
wrote:
> On 02/12/2021 02:48 AM, pdr0 wrote:
> > Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
> >> On 02/12/2021 02:28 AM, pdr0 wrote:
> >>> Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
> On 02/12/2021 01:27 AM, pdr0 wrote:
> > Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
> >> Is
On 02/12/2021 02:48 AM, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
On 02/12/2021 02:28 AM, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
On 02/12/2021 01:27 AM, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
Is there something about inputting raw frames that I don't know?
I'm using 'vspipe' to pipe raw fra
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
> On 02/12/2021 02:28 AM, pdr0 wrote:
>> Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
>>> On 02/12/2021 01:27 AM, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
> Is there something about inputting raw frames that I don't know?
>
> I'm using 'vspipe' to pipe raw frames to 'ffmp
On 02/12/2021 02:28 AM, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
On 02/12/2021 01:27 AM, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
Is there something about inputting raw frames that I don't know?
I'm using 'vspipe' to pipe raw frames to 'ffmpeg -i pipe:'.
The vapoursynth script, 'Mark's.vpy', is
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
> On 02/12/2021 01:27 AM, pdr0 wrote:
>> Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
>>> Is there something about inputting raw frames that I don't know?
>>>
>>> I'm using 'vspipe' to pipe raw frames to 'ffmpeg -i pipe:'.
>>> The vapoursynth script, 'Mark's.vpy', is known good.
>>> The
On 02/12/2021 01:27 AM, pdr0 wrote:
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
Is there something about inputting raw frames that I don't know?
I'm using 'vspipe' to pipe raw frames to 'ffmpeg -i pipe:'.
The vapoursynth script, 'Mark's.vpy', is known good.
The output of vapoursynth is known good.
I've tried t
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote
> Is there something about inputting raw frames that I don't know?
>
> I'm using 'vspipe' to pipe raw frames to 'ffmpeg -i pipe:'.
> The vapoursynth script, 'Mark's.vpy', is known good.
> The output of vapoursynth is known good.
> I've tried to be careful to retain vali
UPDATE
If I remove the 'setpts=N*1001/6/TB' directive, the number of frame drops goes down to 190. I
imagine that means that the problem *is* with PTSs.
BTW, in a mixed vapoursynth-ffmpeg approach, use of 'havsfunc.InterFrame(... NewNum=6,
NewDen=1001, GPU=True) in lieu of 'minterpolat
Is there something about inputting raw frames that I don't know?
I'm using 'vspipe' to pipe raw frames to 'ffmpeg -i pipe:'.
The vapoursynth script, 'Mark's.vpy', is known good.
The output of vapoursynth is known good.
I've tried to be careful to retain valid PTSs, but apparently have failed.
The
13 matches
Mail list logo
