> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 22:43:55 +0300, Ivan Pozdeev wrote:
>> This is good enough for my specific case (except the script requirement -
>> writing and debugging one each time is far from being optimal), but I still
>> wonder if there are any better possibilities.
> Do have a look at the segment
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 22:43:55 +0300, Ivan Pozdeev wrote:
> This is good enough for my specific case (except the script requirement -
> writing and debugging one each time is far from being optimal), but I still
> wonder if there are any better possibilities.
Do have a look at the segment muxer:
> On 14 Dec 2015, at 18:12, Ivan Pozdeev wrote:
>> Hello Ffmpeg-user,
>>
>> I've recently needed to repack a video file to a FAT32 volume - so, 4GB file
>> size limit. So, I'd have liked to output the result into consecutive parts
>> not
>> exceeding this size - like archivers do.
>>
>> The f
On 14 Dec 2015, at 18:12, Ivan Pozdeev wrote:
> Hello Ffmpeg-user,
>
> I've recently needed to repack a video file to a FAT32 volume - so, 4GB file
> size limit. So, I'd have liked to output the result into consecutive parts not
> exceeding this size - like archivers do.
>
> The files need to
Hello Ffmpeg-user,
I've recently needed to repack a video file to a FAT32 volume - so, 4GB file
size limit. So, I'd have liked to output the result into consecutive parts not
exceeding this size - like archivers do.
The files need to be playable, so cutting raw standard output is not an option
(a
