On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 at 00:26, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
> Please post the complete command output to the ffmpeg list.
>
C:\Users\Asian Film Archive\Desktop>ffmpeg -ss 00:00:00 -i "Jula Juli
Bintang Tiga.mxf" -c copy -t 00:05:00 output.mxf
ffmpeg version 4.2.2 Copyright (c) 2000-2019 the FFmpeg develop
> I don't like it, I definitely do not doubt the relevance (I did look into
> the issue several times), I just want to point out that once the issue
> is fixed (from our pov), it is possible that the requested feature
> (remuxing of "interlaced" j2k) will still not work, and never will.
>
> Otoh, i
Am Di., 13. Apr. 2021 um 12:48 Uhr schrieb Erik Dobberkau
:
>
> > Is your input really 720x576 or is it maybe interlaced content
> > encoded as two separate frames with height 288? This is not
> > yet supported by FFmpeg at all without filter insertion, it is
> > possible that we will never write s
Am Di., 13. Apr. 2021 um 17:25 Uhr schrieb Carl Zwanzig :
>
> On 4/13/2021 12:48 AM, Kieran O Leary wrote:
> > The developer of mediainfo, as mediainfo output was included.
>
> Cool, so completely irrelevant* to the question; that or we start
> "blaming" every developer for their program's output.
On 4/13/2021 12:48 AM, Kieran O Leary wrote:
The developer of mediainfo, as mediainfo output was included.
Cool, so completely irrelevant* to the question; that or we start "blaming"
every developer for their program's output.
*only important if MI and ffmpeg report contradicting info for th
> Is your input really 720x576 or is it maybe interlaced content
> encoded as two separate frames with height 288? This is not
> yet supported by FFmpeg at all without filter insertion, it is
> possible that we will never write such atrocities.
>
> Carl Eugen
>
Like it or not, it's a SMPTE standa
On Mon 12 Apr 2021 at 23:39, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
wrote:
> On 2021-04-12 18:02, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > Am Mo., 12. Apr. 2021 um 23:52 Uhr schrieb Carl Zwanzig :
> >>
> >> On 4/12/2021 2:42 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> >>> and since Matthew didn't mention "interlaced"
> >>
> >> Video (ORIGI
On 2021-04-12 18:02, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Am Mo., 12. Apr. 2021 um 23:52 Uhr schrieb Carl Zwanzig :
On 4/12/2021 2:42 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
and since Matthew didn't mention "interlaced"
Video (ORIGINAL)
Scan type: Interlaced
Scan order
Am Mo., 12. Apr. 2021 um 23:52 Uhr schrieb Carl Zwanzig :
>
> On 4/12/2021 2:42 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> > and since Matthew didn't mention "interlaced"
>
> Video (ORIGINAL)
> Scan type: Interlaced
> Scan order : Top Field First
>
>
On 4/12/2021 2:42 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
and since Matthew didn't mention "interlaced"
Video (ORIGINAL)
Scan type: Interlaced
Scan order : Top Field First
Yes, he did.
z!
___
ffmpeg-
On 4/12/2021 2:42 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
Matthew works professionally in digital archiving and I strongly suspect
he does know "what it means".
That's good to hear, but expecting everyone else to know is ridiculous.
z!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing li
Am Mo., 12. Apr. 2021 um 23:38 Uhr schrieb Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
:
>
> On 2021-04-12 06:40, Matthew Yang wrote:
> > Hello all
> >
> > I was trying to extract a 5-minute segment of a video, keeping the same
> > settings using the following command
> >
> > ffmpeg -ss 00:00:00 -i "input.mxf" -c copy -
On 2021-04-12 06:40, Matthew Yang wrote:
Hello all
I was trying to extract a 5-minute segment of a video, keeping the same
settings using the following command
ffmpeg -ss 00:00:00 -i "input.mxf" -c copy -t 00:05:00 output.mxf
However the 'resolution' and 'scan type' of the output differs from
Am Mo., 12. Apr. 2021 um 12:46 Uhr schrieb Matthew Yang
:
> ffmpeg -ss 00:00:00 -i "input.mxf" -c copy -t 00:05:00 output.mxf
Complete, uncut console output missing.
Is your input really 720x576 or is it maybe interlaced content
encoded as two separate frames with height 288? This is not
yet sup
Hello all
I was trying to extract a 5-minute segment of a video, keeping the same
settings using the following command
ffmpeg -ss 00:00:00 -i "input.mxf" -c copy -t 00:05:00 output.mxf
However the 'resolution' and 'scan type' of the output differs from the
original.
Video (ORIGINAL)
ID
15 matches
Mail list logo
