Re: [FFmpeg-user] best_effort_timestamp_time

2018-01-17 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2018-01-17 11:15 GMT+01:00 Wolfgang Hugemann : > [avi @ 002eaee0] sample size (1) != block align (2) > Input #0, avi, from 'C:\Temp\___Motorradvideo\20150424_20_0301.avi': > Duration: 00:05:01.00, start: 0.00, bitrate: 437 kb/s Which camera type is this? I ask because I am curious what

Re: [FFmpeg-user] best_effort_timestamp_time

2018-01-17 Thread Wolfgang Hugemann
> (Assuming the camera does not use FFmpeg as firmware > which is very unlikely.) > You have a problem here. > The input you are analyzing is not the stream that was > created by the traffic camera but a file created with FFmpeg. > So while there may absolutely be an issue (that we may or > may not

Re: [FFmpeg-user] best_effort_timestamp_time

2018-01-16 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
2018-01-16 11:21 GMT+01:00 Wolfgang Hugemann : > In this very case, I will be able to test the video timing at the spot > (using a turntable or alike as a target), but rather often, the cameras are > already dismounted when I come into play, thus this is a question that > matters when settling lit

[FFmpeg-user] best_effort_timestamp_time

2018-01-16 Thread Wolfgang Hugemann
Dear list members, I am analysing a video from a security cam which has recorded a traffic accident. I want to calculate the speeds of the vehicles involved and therefore need the exact time gap between each two frames. When analysing the video with ffprobe it turns out that the time gap is