Re: [FFmpeg-user] fieldmatch "marked as interlaced" -- doesn't work

2021-03-18 Thread pdr0
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote > On 2021-03-18 01:55, pdr0 wrote: > >> https://www.mediafire.com/file/m46kc4p1uvt7ae3/cadence_tests.zip/file > > Thanks again. I haven't tested my filters on cadence.mp4 yet to see if > they work as expected. > > How did you make cadence.mp4? Did you use ffmpeg to ma

Re: [FFmpeg-user] fieldmatch "marked as interlaced" -- doesn't work

2021-03-18 Thread Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
On 2021-03-18 01:55, pdr0 wrote: https://www.mediafire.com/file/m46kc4p1uvt7ae3/cadence_tests.zip/file Thanks again. I haven't tested my filters on cadence.mp4 yet to see if they work as expected. How did you make cadence.mp4? Did you use ffmpeg to make it? Or did you use something else? I

Re: [FFmpeg-user] fieldmatch "marked as interlaced" -- doesn't work

2021-03-17 Thread Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
On 2021-03-18 01:55, pdr0 wrote: Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote I hoped that "marked as interlaced" [1] meant that 'select=expr=not(eq(interlace_type\,TOPFIRST)+eq(interlace_type\,BOTTOMFIRST))' [2] would work. However, the 'select' doesn't work. I'm counting on the 'select' working -- not workin

Re: [FFmpeg-user] fieldmatch "marked as interlaced" -- doesn't work

2021-03-17 Thread pdr0
Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote > I hoped that "marked as interlaced" [1] meant that > > 'select=expr=not(eq(interlace_type\,TOPFIRST)+eq(interlace_type\,BOTTOMFIRST))' > [2] > > would work. However, the 'select' doesn't work. I'm counting on the > 'select' working -- not working > is a complete sho

Re: [FFmpeg-user] fieldmatch "marked as interlaced" -- doesn't work

2021-03-15 Thread Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
On 2021-03-15 06:43, Paul B Mahol wrote: On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 11:18 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: On 2021-03-14 10:47, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: I hoped that "marked as interlaced" [1] meant that 'select=expr=not(eq(interlace_type\,TOPFIRST)+eq(interlace_type\,BOTTOMFIRST))' [2] Have

Re: [FFmpeg-user] fieldmatch "marked as interlaced" -- doesn't work

2021-03-15 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 11:18 PM Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: > On 2021-03-14 10:47, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: > > I hoped that "marked as interlaced" [1] meant that > > > > > 'select=expr=not(eq(interlace_type\,TOPFIRST)+eq(interlace_type\,BOTTOMFIRST))' > [2] > > Have I made myself understoo

Re: [FFmpeg-user] fieldmatch "marked as interlaced" -- doesn't work

2021-03-14 Thread Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
On 2021-03-14 10:47, Mark Filipak (ffmpeg) wrote: I hoped that "marked as interlaced" [1] meant that 'select=expr=not(eq(interlace_type\,TOPFIRST)+eq(interlace_type\,BOTTOMFIRST))' [2] Have I made myself understood? Do you see the problem? ...progressive.&.scan-int.here... 'select' ...only.p

[FFmpeg-user] fieldmatch "marked as interlaced" -- doesn't work

2021-03-14 Thread Mark Filipak (ffmpeg)
I hoped that "marked as interlaced" [1] meant that 'select=expr=not(eq(interlace_type\,TOPFIRST)+eq(interlace_type\,BOTTOMFIRST))' [2] would work. However, the 'select' doesn't work. I'm counting on the 'select' working -- not working is a complete show stopper. Is there some other species o