"In your example all three inputs are images, so the output can be only one
image."-> this doesn;t happen.
The output consists in:
1. the original image
2. the original image + logo
3. the original image + logo + info
I wish it were simpler!
Gabriel
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 12:06 PM Michael Koch
Am 01.03.2023 um 10:55 schrieb Gabriel Dina:
1 frame, indeed, but is the first image without logo and info. Maybe it is
a way to get the last frame?
In your example all three inputs are images, so the output can only one
image.
If the first input is a video, you could add -ss 5 before this i
1 frame, indeed, but is the first image without logo and info. Maybe it is
a way to get the last frame?
Many thanks.
Gabriel
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 11:49 AM Michael Koch
wrote:
> Am 01.03.2023 um 10:39 schrieb Gabriel Dina:
> > Updated command:
> >
> > ffmpeg -i *uploads/test.png* -i ./assets/l
Am 01.03.2023 um 10:39 schrieb Gabriel Dina:
Updated command:
ffmpeg -i *uploads/test.png* -i ./assets/logo.png -i ./assets/telefon.png
-filter_complex
"[1][0]scale2ref=w='iw*1/5':h='ow/mdar'[v1];[2][0]scale2ref=w='iw*9/10':h='ow/mdar'[v2];[0][v1]overlay=main_w-overlay_w-5:5[vid];[vid][v2]overla
Updated command:
ffmpeg -i *uploads/test.png* -i ./assets/logo.png -i ./assets/telefon.png
-filter_complex
"[1][0]scale2ref=w='iw*1/5':h='ow/mdar'[v1];[2][0]scale2ref=w='iw*9/10':h='ow/mdar'[v2];[0][v1]overlay=main_w-overlay_w-5:5[vid];[vid][v2]overlay=10:main_h-overlay_h-10"*
test.png*
Result:
Am 01.03.2023 um 10:23 schrieb Michael Koch:
Am 01.03.2023 um 10:12 schrieb Gabriel Dina:
ffmpeg -i uploads/image.mp4 -i ./assets/logo.png -i ./assets/info.png
-filter_complex "[1][0]scale2ref=w='iw
*1/5':h='ow/mdar'[v1];[2][0]scale2ref=w='iw*9/10':h='ow/mdar'[v2];[0][v1]overlay=main_w-overlay_w
Am 01.03.2023 um 10:12 schrieb Gabriel Dina:
ffmpeg -i uploads/image.mp4 -i ./assets/logo.png -i ./assets/info.png
-filter_complex "[1][0]scale2ref=w='iw
*1/5':h='ow/mdar'[v1];[2][0]scale2ref=w='iw*9/10':h='ow/mdar'[v2];[0][v1]overlay=main_w-overlay_w-5:5[vid];[vid][v2]overlay=10:main_h-overlay_h
ffmpeg -i uploads/image.mp4 -i ./assets/logo.png -i ./assets/info.png
-filter_complex "[1][0]scale2ref=w='iw
*1/5':h='ow/mdar'[v1];[2][0]scale2ref=w='iw*9/10':h='ow/mdar'[v2];[0][v1]overlay=main_w-overlay_w-5:5[vid];[vid][v2]overlay=10:main_h-overlay_h-10"
uploads/image%0d.mp4
If I remove %0d from
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 12:54:06AM -0800, amindfv--- via ffmpeg-user wrote:
> OS: Debian 11.2, latest ffmpeg git master.
>
> I've got a fairly simple filtergraph that's been giving me quite a hard time
> in terms of starting or staying in sync. I've boiled it down to a test case
> with three inp
OS: Debian 11.2, latest ffmpeg git master.
I've got a fairly simple filtergraph that's been giving me quite a hard time in
terms of starting or staying in sync. I've boiled it down to a test case with
three input videos, two identical (i.e. the same file), which clearly shows at
least a frame o
Hi guys,
What I have:
[0:0] = thumbnail.png
[1:0] = aevalsrc="-2+random(0)" (white noise)
[2:0][2:1] = IN_VIDEO.avi (mono audio track)
What I want:
- [0:0] and [1:0] to play/loop unmodified for
${FADE_IN_DURATION_SECONDS}
- THEN [0:0] will xfade into [2:0]
- (however this
Thanks Wayne & John. I guess I only have to find out why I'm not getting
them even though I set up the list server to echo my own posts. Then I
have to figure out why no one responds to my questions. Ah, well...
On 12/15/2019 11:50 AM, Enrico Vittorini wrote:
Hello Gents,
i would need an help
Hello Gents,
i would need an help. I am generating a mosaic with the following code:
ffmpeg -re -y -i input.ts -map_chapters -1 -an -sn -dn
-filter_complex "color=c=black:size=1920x1080 [base];
[0:#0xb0] setpts=PTS-STARTPTS, scale=320x240,
drawtext=fontsize=30:x=(w-text_w)/2:y=(h-text_h)/2:y=200
On 04-03-2019 06:01 PM, Jon bae wrote:
Am Mo., 4. März 2019 um 13:21 Uhr schrieb Moritz Barsnick
:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 17:21:08 +0530, Gyan wrote:
Reproduced. Happens when all output streams are emitted from the same
filtergraph.
[...]
Open a ticket at trac.ffmpeg.org, but search first
Am Mo., 4. März 2019 um 13:21 Uhr schrieb Moritz Barsnick :
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 17:21:08 +0530, Gyan wrote:
> > Reproduced. Happens when all output streams are emitted from the same
> > filtergraph.
> [...]
> > Open a ticket at trac.ffmpeg.org, but search first - there may already
> > be one
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 17:21:08 +0530, Gyan wrote:
> Reproduced. Happens when all output streams are emitted from the same
> filtergraph.
[...]
> Open a ticket at trac.ffmpeg.org, but search first - there may already
> be one.
There is already one:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/3789
"shortest
On 04-03-2019 03:58 PM, Jon bae wrote:
ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -filter_complex "[0:v]null;[0:a]apad,anull" -shortest
-f null -*
Reproduced. Happens when all output streams are emitted from the same
filtergraph.
Doesn't happen with, e.g.
ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -filter_complex "[0:v]null" -filte
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 11:45:16 +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> If audio and video come from the same source, then don't they have
> already the same length?
Not necessarily. Streams within a container can have different lengths.
Moritz
___
ffmpeg-user m
Am 04.03.2019 um 11:28 schrieb Jon bae:
Hello!
Is there a way to apply filter_complex with video filter + audio filter *apad
*and on top using -shortest in command line command?
When I run this:
*ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -filter_complex "[0:v]null;[0:a]apad,anull" -shortest
-f null -*
It end up in
Hello!
Is there a way to apply filter_complex with video filter + audio filter *apad
*and on top using -shortest in command line command?
When I run this:
*ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -filter_complex "[0:v]null;[0:a]apad,anull" -shortest
-f null -*
It end up in endless encoding...
ffmpeg version is th
Hi Gyan,
Thanks a lot,
Seems to work as expected now :)
Alex Molon
-Original Message-
From: ffmpeg-user [mailto:ffmpeg-user-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf Of Gyan
Sent: 31 January 2019 12:59
To: ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] filter_complex and map. Am i confused or
o:ffmpeg-user-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf Of Alex
Molon
Sent: 31 January 2019 12:52
To: FFmpeg user questions
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] filter_complex and map. Am i confused or bug?
Hi Carl,
My problem actually is not the order itself, but how the single tracks are
actually enco
On 31-01-2019 06:11 PM, Alex Molon wrote:
-b:v:vidout1 2M -minrate:v:vidout1 2M -maxrate:v:vidout1 2M \ <- I specify that
[vidout1] has to be encoded in 2M/2M/2M
-b:v:vidout2 1M -minrate:v:vidout2 1M -maxrate:v:vidout2 1M \ <- I specify that
[vidout2] has to be encoded in 1M/1M/1M
Stream s
Eugen Hoyos
Sent: 31 January 2019 12:45
To: FFmpeg user questions
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] filter_complex and map. Am i confused or bug?
2019-01-31 13:41 GMT+01:00, Alex Molon :
> Basically I have a file with a single video track and a single audio track.
>
> What I want to achieve i
2019-01-31 13:41 GMT+01:00, Alex Molon :
> Basically I have a file with a single video track and a single audio track.
>
> What I want to achieve is:
>
>
>
> a) Scale the video track to 720x576 and encode it in H264 @ 2M with 2M
> minrate and 2M maxrate
>
> b) Scale the video track to 640x480 and
Hi guys,
What I'm trying to do, in theory, should be very simple but it seems that I
miss to understand about how ffmpeg routes different tracks.
Basically I have a file with a single video track and a single audio track.
What I want to achieve is:
a) Scale the video track to 720x576 and
Thank you -:)
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018, 17:02 DopeLabs fyi...
>
> - is a hyphen
>
> ' single quote
> " double quote
>
> cheers =]
>
>
> > On Nov 15, 2018, at 1:20 27AM, Mettavihari D wrote:
> >
> > Greetings all,
> >
> > The Problem is solved.
> > It was only a problem of the correct hyphens around
fyi...
- is a hyphen
' single quote
" double quote
cheers =]
> On Nov 15, 2018, at 1:20 27AM, Mettavihari D wrote:
>
> Greetings all,
>
> The Problem is solved.
> It was only a problem of the correct hyphens around the object
>
> '0:a’ should be '0:a'
>
> ffmpeg -y -threads 16 -i video.mp
Greetings all,
The Problem is solved.
It was only a problem of the correct hyphens around the object
'0:a’ should be '0:a'
ffmpeg -y -threads 16 -i video.mp4 -i logo.png -filter_complex
"[1:v]scale=100:-1[logo];[0:v]scale=720:576[vid];[vid][logo]overlay=590:40[out]"
-map '[out]' -map '0:a' -pre
Greetings Joel
-or alternately paste this into the terminal:
ffmpeg -y -threads 16 -i $FILE1.mp4 -i vidasa11.png -filter_complex \
[1:v]scale=100:-1[logo]; "[0:v]scale=720:576[vid];" \
[vid][logo]overlay=590:40[out] -map [out] -map 0:a -preset slower \
-profile:v main -level 3.1 -c:v libx264
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 09:14:40AM +0530, Mettavihari D wrote:
> Greetings
>
> I need a bit of help to understand how to use filter_complex
> I have a video file where I need to insert a logo in the video file.
>
> I have been suggested the following command
>
> ffmpeg -y -threads 16 -i $FILE1.m
Greetings
I need a bit of help to understand how to use filter_complex
I have a video file where I need to insert a logo in the video file.
I have been suggested the following command
ffmpeg -y -threads 16 -i $FILE1.mp4 -i vidasa11.png -filter_complex
[1:v]scale=100:-1[logo]; "[0:v]scale=720:576
Greetings
I need a bit of help to understand how to use filter_complex
I have a video file where I need to insert a logo in the video file.
I have been suggested the following command
ffmpeg -y -threads 16 -i $FILE1.mp4 -i vidasa11.png -filter_complex
[1:v]scale=100:-1[logo]; "[0:v]scale=720:576
On 01-06-2018 05:58 AM, William C Bonner wrote:
I'm using ffmpeg to concatenate a large number of files from my dash cam
and then speed things up by a factor of 60.
It works properly when the number of files is small, but fails as the
filter_complex option string expands. I'm generating the co
I'm using ffmpeg to concatenate a large number of files from my dash cam
and then speed things up by a factor of 60.
It works properly when the number of files is small, but fails as the
filter_complex option string expands. I'm generating the command line from
a program.
From the ffmpeg generate
On 11/18/2017 9:22 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
This has come up before
Could you point me to the report?
See this thread:
https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-user/2017-May/036078.html
Regards,
Gyan
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffm
On Sat, 18 Nov 2017, Gyan Doshi wrote:
You can use 'scale=-1:720:flags=bicubic' in filter_complex to achieve
the same result.
Thanks, that worked, but now the obvious question is which one is
"better"... quality-wise? I'm not that concerned about the size
difference, it was just an indicati
2017-11-18 6:33 GMT+01:00 Gyan Doshi :
>
> On 11/18/2017 10:45 AM, Hans Carlson wrote:
>>
>> What's the difference between "-filter_complex" and "-vf" when
>> only one filter is used? Specially, when the "scale" filter is used.
>
> This has come up before
Could you point me to the report?
Thank
On 11/18/2017 10:45 AM, Hans Carlson wrote:
What's the difference between "-filter_complex" and "-vf" when only one
filter is used? Specially, when the "scale" filter is used.
This has come up before, and looks like it hasn't been fixed.
In the filter_complex, the scale filter uses the bilin
What's the difference between "-filter_complex" and "-vf" when only one
filter is used? Specially, when the "scale" filter is used.
I assumed the results would be the same, but discovered the "-vf" version
creates an mpeg2 file almost 80M larger for my ~600M input test file.
$ ls -lGg TEST
you should use api do it yourself, the ffmpeg command line tool doesn’t
support what you want.
> On 22 Oct 2017, at 8:44 AM, kamal shadi wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to apply a filter_complex operation on multiple rtmp streams.
> Here is my sample run of ffmpeg to do so:
>
> *ffmpeg -i
Hi all,
I am trying to apply a filter_complex operation on multiple rtmp streams.
Here is my sample run of ffmpeg to do so:
*ffmpeg -i rtmp://localhost/live1/stream1 -i rtmp://localhost/live1/stream2
-filter_complex "[1][2]overlay=x=160:y=0" -c:v libx264 -preset veryfast
-b:v 2000k -bufsize 4000k
Sankeeta Bhandari wrote:
>FFmpeg version 0.6.5, Copyright (c) 2000-2010 the FFmpeg
>developers, built on Jan 29 2012 17:52:15 with gcc 4.4.5
>20110214 (Red Hat 4.4.5-6)
We are in 2017 and the current release is 3.2.2.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpe
Hello,
I am trying to run "
*filter_complex*" command on my Godaddy VPS server but it is giving
"Unrecognized
option 'filter_complex' " error. But when I try to run it on my local
system server it works perfectly fine.
I tried contacting Godaddy server support team, but they are saying they
have
Le quartidi 4 vendémiaire, an CCXXIII, Steve Kelly a écrit :
> ffmpeg -i "TEST.MXF" -filter_complex "[0:1][0:2] amerge=inputs=2,
> aformat=sample_fmts=s16:channel_layouts=stereo [a_out]" -map '[0:v]' -map
> '[a_out]' -codec:v prores -profile:v 3 -codec:a pcm_s16le "TEST_CONV.mov"
The "[0:v]" is
On 25 Sep 2014, at 17:19, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 17:05:05 +0100, Steve Kelly wrote:
>> ffmpeg -i "TEST.MXF" —filter_complex "[0:1][0:2] amerge=inputs=2,
>> aformat=sample_fmts=s16:channel_layouts=stereo [a_out]" -map '[0:v]' -map
>> '[a_out]' -codec:v p
Hi Steve,
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 17:05:05 +0100, Steve Kelly wrote:
> ffmpeg -i "TEST.MXF" —filter_complex "[0:1][0:2] amerge=inputs=2,
> aformat=sample_fmts=s16:channel_layouts=stereo [a_out]" -map '[0:v]' -map
> '[a_out]' -codec:v prores -profile:v 3 -codec:a pcm_s16le "TEST_CONV.mov"
>
> Gi
Struggling to get -filter_complex to work. Source file is an MXF with 4 mono
audio streams. I want to take the first two audio streams, convert them to 16
bit and map them into a stereo stream and re-encode the video to a prores MOV
ffmpeg -i "TEST.MXF" —filter_complex "[0:1][0:2] amerge=inputs=
48 matches
Mail list logo
