On 11/2/18, Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
> Am 18.10.18 um 12:13 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
>> On 10/18/18, Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>> So we are trying to encode raw rgb data from a pipe with ffmpeg. We
>>> found that ffmpeg implicitly converts the data to tv range bt601, which
>>> is subo
Am 18.10.18 um 12:13 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
> On 10/18/18, Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> So we are trying to encode raw rgb data from a pipe with ffmpeg. We
>> found that ffmpeg implicitly converts the data to tv range bt601, which
>> is suboptimal. Especially tv range loses more inform
On 10/18/18, Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> So we are trying to encode raw rgb data from a pipe with ffmpeg. We
> found that ffmpeg implicitly converts the data to tv range bt601, which
> is suboptimal. Especially tv range loses more information than
> neccessary, also bt709 seems to be the
Hello,
So we are trying to encode raw rgb data from a pipe with ffmpeg. We
found that ffmpeg implicitly converts the data to tv range bt601, which
is suboptimal. Especially tv range loses more information than
neccessary, also bt709 seems to be the better color space.
We know we can fix this by