2017-11-26 22:01 GMT+01:00 Reindl Harald :
>
>
> Am 25.11.2017 um 19:03 schrieb comp4me:
>>
>> If I will use thread 1 will i get 100% cpu and not 250% cpu?
>> but the performance will be the same?(that what i not understand)
>
> no it will not - the remaining cpu usage is not just for fun
> what th
Am 25.11.2017 um 19:03 schrieb comp4me:
If I will use thread 1 will i get 100% cpu and not 250% cpu?
but the performance will be the same?(that what i not understand)
no it will not - the remaining cpu usage is not just for fun
what the hell do you expect from video encoding?
"why ffmpeg tak
Am 24.11.2017 um 13:11 schrieb comp4me:
I not get you,
if i will apply more than 1 thread will i use on less cpu?
why?
dunno what is unclear by saying "-threads 1 would at least disable
multithreading" which by common sense can't lead to your 250% aka 2.5 cores
_
El 24/11/2017 a las 09:11, comp4me escribió:
I not get you,
if i will apply more than 1 thread will i use on less cpu?
why?
No, he means the opposite. Use 1 thread and you will use less cpu (1 at
100%).
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ff
Am 23.11.2017 um 20:21 schrieb comp4me:
i run this command on pc with cpu i5
ffmpeg -i rtsp://x.x.x.x -i 2.264 -preset ultrafast -filter_complex
"[0]crop=20:20:20:20[a];[a][1] overlay=0:0" http://127.0.0.1/feed.ffm
i see how much this process takes me with "top" command(ubuntu)
I see that it
