Lou lrcd.com> writes:
> Worth reporting as a bug. Related to,
> or can be considered to be, bug #3307:
> https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/3307
You explicitly requested "level 3.0" in that ticket,
so this is another issue afaict.
Carl Eugen
___
ffmpe
> -Original Message-
> From: ffmpeg-user [mailto:ffmpeg-user-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf Of
> Lou
> Sent: 11 January 2016 03:15
> To: ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] x264 level option
>
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 01:00:01 +0100
> Moritz Barsn
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 01:00:01 +0100
Moritz Barsnick wrote:
> In other words: "-level 41" does change something, but not in the same
> way "-level 4.1" does. :-/
x264 binary accepts either and outputs the expected number of refs.
Worth reporting as a bug. Related to, or can be considered to be, b
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 14:33:23 -0900, Lou wrote:
> > I expected the x264 -level option to limit all parameters within the Level
> > specification, but that is not happening.
> Try -level 4.1, not -level 41.
Interesting behavior: preset veryslow, level unspecified vs. 41 vs 4.1:
$ ffmpeg -f lavf
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:55:14 -0800
Elliott Balsley wrote:
> I expected the x264 -level option to limit all parameters within the Level
> specification, but that is not happening.
Try -level 4.1, not -level 41.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@f
I expected the x264 -level option to limit all parameters within the Level
specification, but that is not happening. I'm encoding 1080p video using
-preset veryslow and -level41. The veryslow preset uses ref=16, but Level
4.1 only allows 4. Is the level supposed to take precedence here? FFmpeg
