I propose that we return to using this forum for filmscanners and stop
flaming people.
| i agree about ed. on top of that he is almost rude if you are not good
with
| software and e-mail him personally with questions. vuescan is a difficult
| programs with daily updates and i wish i had gotten si
I shoot Fuji Reala 35mm and scan with a Minolta Svan Elite into PShop
6...
I have discovered something I already knew, but now that I have had my
eyes rubbed in it, I am definitely changing my habits.. I am referring
to grain... specifically the grain you see when you shoot a broad
expanse of any
At 04:00 PM 21/03/01 -0600, you wrote:
>>I am surprised that some of the quotes I included from the ROC patent did
>>not generate more response.
>
>Yeah, I was surprised my message didn't generate more response either. :-)
Don't be too offended - I'm sure that some folk are like me and just read
Sorry, I missed the earlier discussions on the ROC/GEM cleaning algorithms.
Are they generally-available programs? What scanners do they work with?
A brief search of the Net brought up only Minolta.
Best regards--LRA
---
FREE! The World's Best Email A
The easiest way to create it in Photoshop is just hold down the ALT key and
type 0169 on the number keypad.
Stan Schwartz
www.tallgrassimages.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 4:54 AM
T
Here are two of the links we came up with in doing research prior to the
interview.
Interview in PhotoInsider:
http://www.photoinsider.com/pages/maisel/maisel.html
Dallas Observer:
http://www.dallasobserver.com/issues/2000-12-21/arts.html
Larry
I'm not especially interested in reading about
I agree. I'm not especially interested in reading about the intricacies of
copyrights right now (perhaps later and with a sense of urgency), but I
would like to read more comments about Jay Maisel.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Eli Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL
OOPS! Sorry about that, I forgot to change the
header when I sent this. Not that there is anything that can not be said
publicly; it is just I did not want to prolong an otherwise off topic subject
any more than it was being prolonged already.
My
apologies to everyone.
-Original M
>I am surprised that some of the quotes I included from the ROC patent did
>not generate more response.
Yeah, I was surprised my message didn't generate more response either. :-)
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://exp
Thanks very much Dean. That is food for thought.
Hersch
At 09:26 AM 3/21/2001 -0800, you wrote:
I am surprised that some of the quotes I
included from the ROC patent did
not generate more response. I want to comment on some portions of
ROC (or
at least the patent that ROC seems to be based on).
Of course, it all depends on a number of factors. The only universal
statment that one can make as an absolute is that you do not have the right
to "sell images of ANYTHING you photograph." If the sculptures are on
private property or are private property, you need the permission of the
owner to
>Not to "dis" Niko or Rob (it was a perfectly valid and timely response, and
>exactly what this forum is most useful for), but do others think it would
be
>helpful to change the Subject line when responding to a thread that's
gotten
>a bit off-track?
You are right; but for better or worse, it is
>I was interested to read all this stuff on copyright as I have a problem
>myself and wondered if anyone can help.
>
>If I were to take a series of photographs of sculptures around my local town
>and have them printed them up as postcards to sell, would I have to get
>permission from either the sc
I have created a webpage that has 8 examples of the cleaning and grain
removal of Vuescan 7.0.3 and a Minolta Scan Elite scanning a Fuji ISO 100
color negative:
http://www.geocities.com/hr1066/vuescan703.htm
This is similar to the page I created over a month ago using Vuescan 6.6,
but since 7
Yes, please change the subject line when you change the subject.
The "was:abc xyz" could help.
-Original Message-
From: Lynn Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 9:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Jay Maisel Interview with Pictures and
L
Roger,
Since
the topic has come up on each and every list I belong to at one time or another
in a recurring manner, I have decided to respond to your post in private because
I think that there are a few things you should be aware of.
First,
your presentation of information tends to conf
I was interested to read all this stuff on copyright as I have a problem
myself and wondered if anyone can help.
If I were to take a series of photographs of sculptures around my local town
and have them printed them up as postcards to sell, would I have to get
permission from either the sculptor
>In France (and other parts of Europe), the copyright is in perpetuity.
If they are like the current U.S. copyright law, the copyright is not in
perpetuity; but it is for the lifetime of the creator plus 25 years (or it
may be 100 years - I forget) after which it is not renewable. The older
copy
>In the United States, at least, the copyright corresponds to the date of
>publication-
But one needs to remember that the term "publication" as used in the legal
system is construed very broadly to include public display. Thus, if a
photographer sends a brand new photograph to a stock agency to
I am surprised that some of the quotes I included from the ROC patent did
not generate more response. I want to comment on some portions of ROC (or
at least the patent that ROC seems to be based on).
> "The infrared scan is used to detect imperfections in the film medium
> itself. As discussed
This msg brings up a point I've wanted to address, but haven't.
Please note the Subect. Then note the response, and the question it
answered.
Not to "dis" Niko or Rob (it was a perfectly valid and timely response, and
exactly what this forum is most useful for), but do others think it would be
he
>Is there any exact specification for copyright presentation?
Yes, for legal purposes, I think there is both a proper form for the
copyright notice, if it is used, for the contents of the notice, if it is
used, and for the date that should be used. The date, I believe, is the
date of registration
Strange, any queries I had with Ed directly I found him to be very helpful
and polite. You must have hit him on a bad day. Vuescan is difficult
compared to what ? You can still get silverfast.
Dale
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, Ma
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Niko
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 8:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Jay Maisel Interview with Pictures and
> Link...
>
>
> in PSP, press "alt" and type 0169
This works
Guys & Gals,
are we at least going to be informed of any updates to VueScan
or do we just go and look for ourselves.
Regards Chris McBrien.
> At 21:15 20-03-01 -0800, you wrote:
>
> >I find that very interesting, if accurate. Especially after he
> >encouraged the flood of this exact group with literally hundreds, if not
> >thousands, of messages regarding his Vuescan product. He was very
> >willing to use this group to advance his p
Actually, the copyright symbol is available in most fonts. In Photoshop,
add test as you normally do, then when you need the © (copyright sysmbol,
incase it didn't come through), Hold down the alt and type 0169 on the
number pad, assuming your using Windows. MAC users, you're on your own.
This wil
i agree about ed. on top of that he is almost rude if you are not good with
software and e-mail him personally with questions. vuescan is a difficult
programs with daily updates and i wish i had gotten silverfast. joanna
Bob S. wrote, on 20 March 2001:
> {Ed Hamrick} may not be announcing new releases on the list. In other
correspondence he wrote a few days ago "I'm not on this [filmscanner]
mailing list any more - too many off-topic postings."
I'm glad that today (Mar 21) some other members are seeing the iron
in PSP, press "alt" and type 0169
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Geraghty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Jay Maisel Interview with Pictures and Link...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >circle around it) or
Rob's "workaround" reminds me of one of those bugs that "don't exist in
Photoshop" (per a slapdown of several months ago ;-))--it will install its
own version of "Wingdings" over the native font in Windows (Win 98, at
least), leaving you without sometimes-useful symbols/dingbats that you once
had.
At 21:15 20-03-01 -0800, you wrote:
>I find that very interesting, if accurate. Especially after he
>encouraged the flood of this exact group with literally hundreds, if not
>thousands, of messages regarding his Vuescan product. He was very
>willing to use this group to advance his product sales
Very good summary, Roger, and concise. One correction:
>The copyright expires after a certain number of years
(I don't remember the specifics) and the clock starts running the moment the
art work is "fixed in media," not when it's published.
This *was* true, but I think it's been changed recentl
Larry wrote:
> Is there any exact specification for copyright presentation?
There is not, AFAIK (although Congress keeps futzing around with the law to
cater to special interests). If the work is published, the copyright is in
force, and even if it is not published, the copyright is implied. A s
"Henry Richardson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> another story. I often get grain aliasing in the sky but other areas of
the
> image rarely have much of a grain aliasing problem. I'm not sure why this
> is so, but it has been my pretty consistent experience. Even stranger,
even
> other hi
Bob wrote:
> I think you must realize that the 110 format probably didn't
produce the best negative or transparency because it relied on a plastic
cartridge to hold the film flat and at the precise film plane.
That's certainly true for the inexpesive 110 cameras, but I recall that
Asahi (Pentax)
Berry wrote:
>
> If Jay Maisel has not shot film, except for one roll, during the past
year,
how is it that all of the images are copyright 2001, yet most are from film?
> I guess the copyright does not correspond to the date the image was shot?
In the United States, at least, the copyright corr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>circle around it) or spell out the word, "copyright." Does anyone know how
>to make the copyright symbol in Photoshop? I've tried, failed, and don't
>even know if it's possible.
It's part of the Symbol character set in Windows. I just put one into an
image
in Paintsho
Art
How do you know Ed has abandoned the list, have I missed something?
--
Regards
Richard
//
| @ @ --->>> Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
C _) )
--- '
__ /
Yes, my mistake, the prices quoted are ex VAT. The
LS-8000 is not listed yet.
Pete
- Original Message -
From:
Cooke, Julie
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 2:58
PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: New Nikon
Scanner pricing in the UK (LS-40,
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Bob Shomler wrote:
> It may be necessary to send bug reports and other vuescan requests
> direct to Ed.
Well, isn't that where they should be sent in the first place? Why would
they be sent here? I agree totally with what Art just wrote. It would be
totally different thing i
In a message dated 3/20/2001 9:19:32 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are several legal issues in terms of dating images for copyright.
On the one hand, you receive your copyright the moment you press the
shutter button, even prior to processing... which protects you
well said Art. I have noticed that Ed is still frequenting news groups,
which hold much more noise than filmscanners. Anyway, nobody is forced to
read all the traffic, if you don't like any particular OT, just skip it.
You're right, we had both (the group and Ed) benefit from discussions. BTW,
43 matches
Mail list logo
