[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> am new to the filmscanner world, so please bear with the newbie questions.
>
> I'm considering either the Acer Scanwit 2720s or the 2740s. My perception
> after reading the specs, is that the 2740s is 2720s+ICE. Did I miss
> anything?
>
> Would like o
- Original Message -
From: "shAf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 1:59 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon 4000 ED Review Part III
> What's the deal with ICE^3 support for the new Nikon scanners only??
> If Nikon offers NS3 for the LS-2000, why no
Jack writes ...
> ...
> It is amazing what Digital ROC can do for under
> and over exposed images!
> Scenes with washed our color come alive! They don't
> have to be old and faded, but when they are,
> the color comes back better than the original.
> The color appears more accurate also. Try it.
>Additional features about NikonScan that I haven't investigated
>thoroughly yet are the 'Grain reduction algorithm' and the
>'restoration of colour algorithm'. I hope I don't need to explore the
>'ROC' for a while yet...it'd be somewhat alarming if 2-10 yr old negs
>that have been properly s
Don't know if this came up while I was away, but Lizard Tech, home of Mr Sid
is acquiring Genuine Fractals
http://www.lizardtech.com/company/pressreleases/4_11_01_altamira.html
Tim A
Andy Adler wrote:
>
> Thanks for the very informative evaluation, Dieder. I wonder -- since at
> least one user found this to be a problem -- how did you find the
> edge-of-frame sharpness to be when scanning at 4000dpi? Is shallow depth of
> field truly an issue with this scanner? I'm about to p
Hi all,
am new to the filmscanner world, so please bear with the newbie questions.
I'm considering either the Acer Scanwit 2720s or the 2740s. My perception
after reading the specs, is that the 2740s is 2720s+ICE. Did I miss
anything?
Would like opinions/experiences of whether the ICE was wor
Dieder writes ...
> ...
>
> A few comments about NikonScan 3.0.
> ---
>
> I am impressed at the accuracy of the colour that is
> available now. ...
Which color spaces are you scanning into? Which "wide gamut" color
spaces does NS3 offer??
shAf :o)
Thanks for the very informative evaluation, Dieder. I wonder -- since at
least one user found this to be a problem -- how did you find the
edge-of-frame sharpness to be when scanning at 4000dpi? Is shallow depth of
field truly an issue with this scanner? I'm about to purchase one, so I'm
especiall
Art wrote:
>All the clues are there...
>1) Taken at Disneyland
>2) Typical atmospheric gradation
>3) look of woven paper stock
>4) "crinkled" look
>This one doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure out!
>Heck, don't you know a painted backdrop when you see one? You think anyone
would go to D
FWIW here is the response from Nikon USA support to the question "Will
Nikonscan 3.0 work with the LS2000 on Win 98 original (not SE)?" They
may not know much, but are at least candid about it.
-
Dear Julian Robinson:
While Nikon Scan 3.X will someday work with
Hi Berry,
Just to keep things straight, where are you located, and where did the
scanner go?
A ROM-IC is probably an EPROM or similar chip which has the firmware in
it. They have probably done an upgrade due to bugs in an earlier version.
Under the circumstances, I would demand three to four
This is what I love about computers. These supposedly logical beasts,
which will not allow you to misplace a comma, or use an incorrect letter
casing, seem to be able to reconfigure themselves, without being asked.
I don't claim to be a USB interface programmer, or even a knowledgeable
user
Julian,
From: "Julian Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I want to try Nikonscan 3 too (with LS2000), but can't work out if I must
> have Win98SE or not. The website says you do, but that may be only for
the
> Firewire interface. I have only Win98 original. Does anyone know if you
> can use th
The version of one of my plugin for photoshop and MAC are
NikonScan Plugin 3.1 and version 3.2.0
I don't think its out yet.I got it as a test example weeks ago. Less
problems with crashes and Photoshop, but slow as before.
Mikael Risedal
>From: "Jeremy Brookfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Re
Mikael Risedal wrote:
> I did a big work today for a airplane company newspaper. Start to scan with
> ED 4000 and NikonScan 3.1
Is Nikon Scan 3.1 available ? What differences are there to 3.0?
>
> I hope that Silverfast soon will upgrade 5.2 to fit ED 4000and firewire,
> its 10 times faster
16 matches
Mail list logo
