I won't argue that CCD scanners do not typically capture the resolution
I am referring to. In discussions with Phil Lippencott several years
ago, he indicated to me that a properly captured 35mm Kodachrome slide
(I'm not recalling if it was a 25 or 64 ISO film) could produce a
close to 150 meg fi
Paul Chefurka wrote:
>
> After all, 4000 ppi gives a resolution of 75 lp/mm or so, and it takes pretty
>remarkable
technique to actually get that kind of resolution onto film. Or is my crude
first-approximation
assessment incorrect, and we actually can't resolve detail in the scan at m
"John & Anne Mahany" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Win 98SE and SS4k. However, I don't think the scanner is relevant
because
> the "Illegal operations" box comes up instantly I click on "open".
I presume you have the scanner switched on before you boot the PC. Vuescan
should still start even wi
Sorry I'm not familiar with conventional chemical darkroom and planning to go directly
digital darkroom, with Nikon LS-8000ED, also I'm learning photography with few
experience. So if my question sounds stupid, just laugh.
Simply, will Digital output surpass the Conventional Chemical Darkroom's
Hello all.
This lurker is going to retire his old Scan Dual and has decided to go
with either the Coolscan IV or a Scan Elite due to budget restrictions(there
seems to be a fire sale on Scan Elites right now). A used/refurb 4000ppi
model is not out of the question but ICE would be nice ;)
O
I am finding that Vuscan V7.1 on an HPS20 scanner
and Sony VAIO computer running Windows ME with 3xxMB RAM crashes after about 3
scans while I am printing.
Didnt happen with Vuscan V7.0.25.
Norman Quinn
Or the new Canoscan 4000? Decent price, not no real user experiences yet?
Tim A
Tony
There are something else with VueScan just now if I compare VueScan to
NikonScan and Silverfast. Little bit flat, doll and color less.
I have send MR Hamrick 3 test pictures scanned by NikonScan, VueScan and
Silverfast+ LS2000. Nothing more done than dragged to Photoshop and auto
levels.
remove
The flatness is good - it means that the highlights and shadows have NOT
been clipped, and you can set those points wherever you wish in Photoshop or
other graphics program.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Mikael Risedal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 1
In a message dated 6/17/2001 1:17:38 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> There are something else with VueScan just now if I compare VueScan to
> NikonScan and Silverfast. Little bit flat, doll and color less.
>
> I have send MR Hamrick 3 test pictures scanned by NikonScan, VueScan and
> Si
In a message dated 6/17/2001 12:35:50 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> This lurker is going to retire his old Scan Dual and has decided to go
> with either the Coolscan IV or a Scan Elite due to budget
restrictions(there
> seems to be a fire sale on Scan Elites right now). A used/refurb 4
From: Austin Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm a REAL minimalist. I develop my own film, and make sure it has
NO
> particulate matter on it after it is dry, and put it into ClearFile
holders
> to keep dust off of them, then into a 3 ring SEALED notebook, and
into a
> file cabinet. I use a filte
> What is your printing workflow?
I only re-size in PS (no interpolation, I just let the DPI fall where ever
it falls), then (in custom) set the print driver to micro-weave, not high
speed, usually to the highest resolution etc. Put paper in printer, hit
"print" button ;-)
remove
Maris
I think everyone will gain to have a rely good VueScan software. I will.
(Spec. with negative film ) I understand that you also have done the
same test as I have with the 3 software's: NikonScan 3.1 VueScan 7.1 and
Silverfast 5.2. And that you have been looking at:ower all perfo
Remove
At 03:15 PM 6/16/01 +0100, you wrote:
>On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:52:51 -0400 rafeb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>> This is odd. If it were me, I'd toss the blue channel,
>> which is more often than not the one with the most noise
>> and the least usable information.
>>
>> The red channel, OTOH,
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 22:34:20 -0700 Roy Smyth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This is a common misconception - relating bit depth to dynamic range.
Oh, chestnut time again! :)
> The number of bits that the A to D converter produces
> determines how finely the range of the CCD is quantized
It als
> > This is a common misconception - relating bit depth to dynamic range.
> > The number of bits that the A to D converter produces
> > determines how finely the range of the CCD is quantized
>
> It also sets the maximum possible dynamic range (OD) which the system is
> capable of encoding. This i
What about Polaroid Sprintscan 4000? The price tag is the same as Coolscan
IV. Canon CanoScan FS4000US is about $100 more, Dimage Scan Elite 2820dpi
is almost $300 cheaper.
I am facing the same though decision. Hopefully somebody will bring some
light.
I wish this had been mentioned in the Help files.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 3:31 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Skin tones
[snipped]
| When the "Color|Restore colors" option is enabled, the
| choice of film
You must be thinking of someone else - I have not done comparison tests, and
rarely use NikonScan, instead using VueScan for the initial image and then
any additional corrections and final sharpening in my graphics program. I
have only Silverfast SE for my flatbed, but not for my filmscanner.
Ma
> Ever hear the joke about the guys in prison, over the years, instead of
> telling the same jokes over and over again, they just use a number "Hey,
> #56" and people laugh...
That brings back memories! When I was editor-in-chief of my high-school
yearbook (going back a few years :) we noted that
"mnemonic" ?
Can't remember what that means. ISTR I could even spell it
on demand, a long time ago.
SWALK
Alan T
- Original Message -
From: Todd Radel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 4:47 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: brief density math lesson...
25 matches
Mail list logo
