Al, that is pretty much the way I see it, except I can't
quite see going back to a rangefinder with fixed lens. I've been an SLR
fan since the 1950's. The ability to see exactly what is in the frame,
and now being able to zoom a pretty wide range is the creative tool I'm
addicted to. All I can do
Hi Rob
Changing to "Image" plus the increasing in the brightness to 1.2 brightened
the output.
Thanks for the tip.
Thanks
Ramesh
-Original Message-
From: Rob Geraghty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 4:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: RE: films
Here 'tis http://phi.res.cse.dmu.ac.uk/Filmscan/
Norman Unsworth
Management Specialist
w: 609 645 7700 x4527 f: 609 645 5891
This message has been prepared on resources managed by Atlantic County
Government. It is subject to the Internet & E-mail Use Policy of Atlantic
County Government.
Con
That's an interesting possibility. I'll check it out...
Norm Unsworth, Owner
Clark Systems Custom Golf: Outstanding Quality and Value in Custom Golf
Equipment
609 641 5712
Please send email to me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our Web Site at http://home.earthlink.net/~clarksystems
> -Original
Which brings up some additional questions--
I'm a real newbie to this area, though a physicist by trade. I've suddenly
gotten interested in photography again, after a long lapse. I bought me an
Acer 2740S, which seems to be a reasonable low-cost entry machine, and
began exploring unknown (to me
Sort of. There were three iterations of this basic design, two as the
Leica CL, and last as the Minolta CLE. The first were collaborations
between Leica and Minolta with a mechanical shutter and sort of wonky
metering mechanics. Never really like that camera personally because
of that. Minolta
I've seen scanned grain from Fujicolor 160 negs that seemed about
equal or larger than scanned Fujicolor 800 negs, so I suspect you're
correct about the frequency intermodulation theory.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Tony Sleep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday,
The pop photo article is on line at:
http://popphoto.com/Camera/ArticleDisplay.asp?ArticleID=33
Thanks to all for the very helpful comments and suggestions regarding both
subjects - printer setting and Vuescan settings. Imagine trying to muddle
through all this without the help of so many who've been there before!
BTW - has there been a huge influx of postings to this list? I'm getting 2
to
In a message dated 7/2/2001 8:05:14 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I have a Nikon LS3 and using NikonScan 3 and Vuescan have very similar
> problems to what you describe.
> I shot allot of backlit subjects and interiors where a light source is in
> the picture. For this Nikon scan wins.
Hi Jawed,
I have a Nikon LS3 and using NikonScan 3 and Vuescan have very similar
problems to what you describe.
I shot allot of backlit subjects and interiors where a light source is in
the picture. For this Nikon scan wins. For studio shots where the lighting
is frontal I find Vuescan gives the b
Way off topic but I think this is what you are referring to:
http://www.ibm.com/news/2001/06/25.phtml
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Arthur Entlich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Digicams again was Re: films
>Tony Sleep wrote:
>..No, IME you are unlikely to see genuine grain off ISO200 Fuji using
> >2700ppi. You are likely to get some aliasing which looks like grain. A way
> >to check this would be to have a reasonably large C41 print made (say
> >12x8"). I'll bet.
There's a cheaper way for those wh
One area where there seems to be major movement is in density of
transistors. I just read somewhere that IBM has once again figured out
a way to increase density considerably... I think it was ten times the
current "standard". I only skimmed the article, but I believe they were
talking about ele
Am I mistaken, or wasn't the Minolta CLE also sold in a different skin
as a Leica?
Dave King wrote:
>
> I'm a big Minolta CLE fan also. I sold my Leica M camera years ago to
> get one. It doesn't have the build quality of an M, and the auto
> exposure shutter electronics can be finicky (don'
Thanks for the enlightening (excuse the pun) essay regarding how film
speeds are determines.
I also had no idea that the decision was a mixture of standard and
consensus, and was always looking for conspiracy theories with
manufacturers in trenchcoats and secret handshakes ;-)
> and requires t
On Sun, 01 Jul 2001 15:28:32 -0500 Stan Schwartz ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
>
> I can rarely finish a batch scan at full resolution without my system
> either
> freezing, rebooting itself or getting a message that there has been a
> problem with the SCSI bus. The most common of these three is
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001 15:56:06 -0400 G3 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Second, if it's reasonable, I might ask for some help
> retrieving some recent messages comparing the new Nikon LS4000 with
> the new Canon 4000 and the Polaroid SprintScan 4000.
http://phi.res.cse.dmu.ac.uk/Filmscan/
Re
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001 22:29:44 -0400 Dave King ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> You see grain size vary by tone/color in analogue prints too.
Yes
> It
> would be very interesting to compare CCD scans and inkjet prints to
> analogue enlargements. I'm wondering if the grain variance effect is
> simil
In a message dated 7/1/2001 4:03:16 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> Vuescan definitely doesn't produce skintones that make me want to puke - but
> at the same time I feel it produces results that are a little flat looking,
> both in contrast and in colour.
Use sRGB and reduce "Color|Gamm
20 matches
Mail list logo
