Austin Franklin wrote:
>
> When I got my SS4k, I wanted a cover for it...you know, one of those plastic
> covers that you would expect a precision optical device would, if not come
> with, would be available from the manufacturer...so when not in use, it
> wouldn't allow any dust to get inside
Ed wrote:
> VueScan uses a predictor of 2 - 7 isn't a valid predictor. All 2 means is
> to take the difference between adjacent pixel values before compressing.
I don't understand. If a predictor of 2 is invalid why would you use it?
The error I get from PSP is "A predictor of 2 is only support
In a message dated 9/4/2001 6:16:48 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > VueScan uses a predictor of 2 - 7 isn't a valid predictor. All 2 means is
> > to take the difference between adjacent pixel values before compressing.
>
> I don't understand. If a predictor of 2 is invalid why would y
Just put a humidifier where you do your scans, run it only when you plan to
handle your pictures.. if you are worried about the humidity affecting your
stored negs, then allow them to dry before storing again.
jimhayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I do live
>in a dry climate, but in a rural are
> > Austin Franklin wrote:
> >
> > When I got my SS4k, I wanted a cover for it...you know, one of
> those plastic
> > covers that you would expect a precision optical device would,
> if not come
> > with, would be available from the manufacturer...so when not in use, it
> > wouldn't allow any du
Ed wrote:
> > > VueScan uses a predictor of 2 - 7 isn't a valid predictor. All 2
means is
> > > to take the difference between adjacent pixel values before
compressing.
> > I don't understand. If a predictor of 2 is invalid why would you use
it?
> A predictor of 7 is invalid.
> A predictor of
>But did it come with a plastic dust cover? ;-)
>
>Considering your extensive abilities and interests I'm disappointed you
>didn't make one yourself for the SS4000. I'm sure Genevieve has done
>so!
I use a plastic bag for a dust cover.
Mike Duncan
Winsor Crosby wrote:
>
> >
> From the Polaroid page for the SS120: (10,000 X 3 = 30,000)>
>
> Since the banding problem has not turned up with the Polaroid
> implementation I don't think that the three row CCD idea is something
> that does not work in practice. It may or may not depending on
Hi I'm using Polaroid SS4000.
My scanner doesn't work, I hear running motor all the time, like on booting
stage and nothing happens. Computer didn't see SCSI unit. What to do? Is
there any hard reset button inside? Please help if you can. Thanks in
advance.
andrzej
--
Andrzej Artymowicz
[EMAI
Andrzej wrote:
>Hi I'm using Polaroid SS4000.
>My scanner doesn't work, I hear running motor all the time, like on booting
>stage and nothing happens. Computer didn't see SCSI unit. What to do? Is
>there any hard reset button inside? Please help if you can. Thanks in
>advance.
Exactly the same t
In my case, neither worked, and it had to go back to Polaroid for the CCD to
be replaced. Thankfully, under warranty.
Keep the dust out!
Tom
> Andrzej wrote:
> >Hi I'm using Polaroid SS4000.
> >My scanner doesn't work, I hear running motor all the time, like on
booting
> >stage and nothing ha
What scanner do you have? I am surprised you are having softening of your
images. On the original Nikon LS2000, Nikon offered two modes, "normal" and
"fine". We believe they should have be labeled "soften" and "normal." The
advantage of Nikon's "normal" mode is that some softening will reduce the
David, All:
The current issue of MacWorld (October) has a review of 7
film scanners by Bruce Fraser. From what I've seen of Bruce's work,
I'm sure the review was done carefully. The Polaroid SS4000 scored
the highest (combination of performance and price?). All the
scanners did well
I just wanted to share my excitement about getting the cover photo and two
articles in the September issue of Australian Ultralight magazine. I confess
my brother produces the magazine for the AUF, but it's still cool to have
my photos published in a news-stand magazine. The photos were taken on
JASC hasn't taken compression/decompression of 48-bit images
seriously because PSP can't work with them. If you do load a
48-bit image you can only save it as 24-bit. For 'serious'
users (which doesn't include me) this is a bad drawback, and
means you're stuck with Photoshop or similar.
I used to
Congratulations Rob! It is cool.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Geraghty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:51 PM
Subject: filmscanners: OT (a bit): Publishing pictures :)
| I just wanted to share my excitement about getting the co
Alan wrote:
> JASC hasn't taken compression/decompression of 48-bit images
> seriously because PSP can't work with them. If you do load a
> 48-bit image you can only save it as 24-bit.
Oh, sure. I was just pointing out that ACDSee wasn't the only program which
had problems with the Vuescan compr
In a message dated 9/4/2001 7:59:46 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> VueScan already is beginning to support OS X, but I assume
> that it will need a Polaroid "driver" to work from.
VueScan works fine on OS X with the SprintScan 4000
without any Polaroid drivers installed.
Regards,
Ed Hamr
18 matches
Mail list logo
