[filmscanners] Re: Vuescan 7.5.b12

In a message dated 2/6/2002 2:52:01 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I notice in your "what's new for beta 11" that you changed the auto > eject to eject right after a scan completes. I find that when doing a > device|batch scann|all with VueScan set to device|auto eject|scan it ejects > t

[filmscanners] RE: Digital ICE

>Digital ICE is unique (and patent protected) > in that it "looks through" the surface defects and identifies > the underlying information in the film. Not sure I understand this. If the defect is, say, a speck of a substance (talc, eg) that cannot be penetrated by anything the scanner can throw

[filmscanners] RE: Slightly OT: Hard Drive Speed

> >> Please name the two drives you are claiming are a FIVE times price > increase > for SCSI vs IDE.<< > > I looked up wholesale pricing for the IBM 18gb SCSI drive being discussed, > vs a 7200 rpm 100gb IDE drive for the same price and posted the > results in a > previous message. The SCSI driv

[filmscanners] Re: nikon 4000 ED (ICE, Tmax, Kodachrome)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Date sent: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 10:13 + (GMT) > Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:[filmscanners] Re: nikon 4000 ED > > > On Tue, 5 Feb

[filmscanners] Re: Slightly OT: Hard Drive Speed

Moreno , please, give up ! with such a flame ... I am a 21 years old IBM Sales Representative and I can assure you cannot compare apple to apple in such a manner ... first of all a 100GB as got an owful throughput provided the inherent density of data per actuator ... it is almost unfair toward th

[filmscanners] RE: Vuescan 7.5.b12

Yep, works fine! Thanks... Tom -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 6:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Vuescan 7.5.b12 In a message dated 2/6/2002 2:52:01 PM EST, [

[filmscanners] Re: VueScan 7.5 beta 13 Available

Hello Ed. Any news on the problem with multiprocessor Linux systems? Thanks Luca On Wed, 2002-02-06 at 18:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I just released VueScan 7.5 beta 13 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X > and Linux. It can be downloaded from: > > http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html > > What's new in

[filmscanners] Re: Slightly OT: Hard Drive Speed

>> Please name the two drives you are claiming are a FIVE times price increase for SCSI vs IDE.<< I looked up wholesale pricing for the IBM 18gb SCSI drive being discussed, vs a 7200 rpm 100gb IDE drive for the same price and posted the results in a previous message. The SCSI drive costs more tha

[filmscanners] Re: Slightly OT: Hard Drive Speed

Moreno, on my desk right now I have 4 x 18.2 SEALED NEW IBM U-SCSI-3 bought from PCPARTSINC www.pcpartsinc.com who is a legitimate dealer and more over is a Company so Police and FBI can go and inspect whenever they want. Eache of the drives costed 100$ and they NEW + SEALED + UNDER 3 Years warran

[filmscanners] Sprintscan 120 35mm strip holder for panoramic modification.

Several list members were having difficulty locating the Sprintscan 120 35MM film strip holder for modification to scan 35mm panoramic slide. Here is the information to order this part in the United States. Call 800-552-0711 hit 3 then 1 This puts you into order services. Ask for PID 119706. It

[filmscanners] RE: Slightly OT: Hard Drive Speed

How about taking all this HD and CPU stuff offline!!! I, for one, am really tired of getting deluged with all this CRAP all over again. Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanner

[filmscanners] Vuescan 7.5.b10

Just loaded the new Vuescan on my Mac with OS8.6 and 256 mg of ram. When the scan begins I get a message saying that it is unable to allocate enough memory and to increase my virtual memory. I never needed virtual memory before, which I keep off. Is there a way around this? 7.4.2 runs fine wit

[filmscanners] NikonScan 3 for Mac OS X

Nikon says it will be released in April. Of course, if current trends are any indication, by then most of us will be using VueScan version 9.4.21. -- Julian Vrieslander -

[filmscanners] Re: VueScan: 7.5 betas (Mac) glacially slow

In a message dated 2/6/2002 10:25:24 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I'm testing slide scans at 500 dpi that take 12-15 minutes to complete; > they took only 2 minutes with VueScan 7.4.2 Are you setting some of the options in the Filter tab? Some cause the CPU time to go up significantly.

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning old Lantern Slides (Off Topic)

John Prokos wrote: > Art, > > I know I asked for opinions and I am truly grateful for yours! However I > have to respond to your statements. How much has film changed since the time > people used 8" floppies and 12" Bernoulli disk? Digital moves on and film > moves on and people update their to

[filmscanners] Re: VueScan 7.5 beta 8 Available

Steve: >Lets face it, memory is pretty cheap right now - and nerds like us >scanner folks probably already have loads of it just so we can scan >and manipulate images anyway :-) I'm in agreement. I have a Polaroid SprintScan 4000, and I'd love to be able to make multiple passes. Or even the lo

[filmscanners] RE: Slightly OT: Hard Drive Speed

> The newer and larger 7200 rpm drives typically have a larger > cache than the > older drives, and this would provide a larger performance gain than going > from an Ultra ATA 66 to Ultra ATA 100. Do you believe a larger cache helps with large file reads and writes? For reads it is no help, and

[filmscanners] RE: Slightly OT: Hard Drive Speed

> Putting eBay aside, if you buy from a legit dealer, you can expect to pay > four to five times as much, per gigabyte of storage, when you choose SCSI > over IDE. I think that's BS. Do you have numbers to substantiate that, using same speed drives?

[filmscanners] Re: VueScan 7.5 beta 9 Available

In a message dated 2/5/2002 4:28:58 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Obviously, there is an issue with scanners like these which do a > separate IR pass. However, given the the difference in IR focus (and IR > light source location) on all scanners with an IR channel, would there be > any

[filmscanners] Re: Vuescan feature request

In a message dated 2/5/2002 11:10:08 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Would it be possible to change the way files are named in Vuescan? If I set > "warn on overwrite", it warns me after the scan has completed which means > I've wasted that time. You haven't actually wasted the time. Just

[filmscanners] VueScan 7.5 beta 11 Available

I just released VueScan 7.5 beta 11 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X and Linux. It can be downloaded from: http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html What's new in version 7.5 beta 11 * Changed auto eject to eject right after scan completes * Increased maximum number of raw scan files to 10,000 * Reduced disp

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning old Lantern Slides

On Tue, 05 Feb 2002 00:22:04 -0800 John Prokos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I have taken on a project to scan 50 old lantern slides from a Mt > McKinley > expedition in 1910. I have seen what informally looked like very good results from the Microtek 8700 flatbed. It has a glassless carrier for

[filmscanners] Finally, I can talk about the SS4000+ (LONG)

Some of you might have noticed that I haven't been complaining much about my film scanner lately. Those same people probably know I'm not easy to please... So, did my Minolta Dual II suddenly get fixed, or was it replaced with a new one that worked "like butter"? No such luck. What did happen

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning old Lantern Slides (Off Topic)

Art, I know I asked for opinions and I am truly grateful for yours! However I have to respond to your statements. How much has film changed since the time people used 8" floppies and 12" Bernoulli disk? Digital moves on and film moves on and people update their tools. I am sounding very pro digit

[filmscanners] RE: Slightly OT: Hard Drive Speed

PLEASE - we did this whole raid/striping, ide vs scsi thing about 3 months ago. Do we have to go through it all again?!?! :-( Mark Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners

[filmscanners] Re: Slightly OT: Hard Drive Speed

>>SCSI hard disk drives is the answer. Faster than any IDE , multiple access at the same time and greater number of units for the same number of controllers. Price is NOT a problem ... I have already bought 4 x 18.2 IBM 10,000rpm SCSI-3 for 95$ each (on eBay) << Putting eBay aside, if you buy fro

[filmscanners] Re: Slightly OT: Hard Drive Speed

>>I understand, also, that RPM is more important that which version ATA your internal drives are. That is to say ATA66 (if you don't have ATA100) is probably fine with a 7200 RPM drive, because the disk is more likely to be the bottleneck than the interface.<< It depends on a few factors, but bas