Mark Otway said:
> I find that turning down the application's priority using Task
> Manager (I set it to 'below normal' on Windows XP) gives me a bit
> more CPU time, meaning I can still read my email, etc, whilst
> scanning, if necessary.
>
> Mark
You can make a shortcut which starts the program
Just a follow up to a previous note in which I complained about Epson 950C
print times for full-bleed A4. Using USB 2.0, it's blindingly energetically
fast, roughly 3 minutes or so for max quality borderless A4.
Through the parallel port, it remains a sloth, and I haven't tested it on
USB 1.1 ye
Just out of interest, how does this compare to the speed when not using
borderless mode (still using the USB 2.0 interfacing)
Art
David J. Littleboy wrote:
> Just a follow up to a previous note in which I complained about Epson 950C
> print times for full-bleed A4. Using USB 2.0, it's blindingl
"Arthur Entlich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asks:
>>
Just out of interest, how does this compare to the speed when not using
borderless mode (still using the USB 2.0 interfacing)
<<<
Two minutes 40 seconds, printing to "premium glossy photo paper". (I didn't
time the borderless print a
I'm running mine on XP Pro with no problems at all.
Lloyd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Edward F.
VanderBush
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] SS4000 on Windows XP
Is anyone running th
Art,
I'm planning on asking some pointed questions too. I have contacted
Polaroid about renewing my extended waranty on my SS4000. They are quite
happy to do that, and I was told they would be selling scanners "for the
rest of the year". So far, phone tag has delayed my decision. If I reup,
that
