[filmscanners] RE: IV ED dynamic range... DYNAMIC RANGE!

2002-08-08 Thread Kapetanakis, Constantine
You may use other filters but must be able to correlate to a film density. This correlation is not linear and will be different for each scanner. The problem arises from the fact that a densitotemeter reads densities differently than a scanner. A densitometer captures all light passing through

[filmscanners] RE: IV ED dynamic range... DYNAMIC RANGE!

2002-08-08 Thread Austin Franklin
Hi Toodd, Ouch. Sigh. Dynamic range: 1. The difference, in decibels, between the overload level and the minimum acceptable signal level in a system or transducer. snip 5. The difference between the maximum acceptable signal level and the minimum acceptable signal level.

[filmscanners] Re: PS sharpening

2002-08-08 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Sharpening will not recover lost detail. It only creates an illusion of sharpness, and it is very easy to overdo, so beware. - Original Message - From: Alex Zabrovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 23:53 Subject: [filmscanners] RE: PS sharpening

[filmscanners] RE: IV ED dynamic range... DYNAMIC RANGE!

2002-08-08 Thread Austin Franklin
Peter, Some time ago you promised us a paper setting out your definition, derivations and sources. I HAVE provided definitions, clear, concise definitions. I have also clearly provided my assertions etc. I said I would write-up something, I never made any PROMISE to do so, nor stated any

[filmscanners] RE: IV ED dynamic range

2002-08-08 Thread Austin Franklin
As far as I remember, theoretical dynamic range's maximum is 4.0 which is ideal ... There is no theoretical limit to dynamic range. It's like a Richter or decibel scale, open-ended in one direction. There IS a theoretical limit to DENSITY range, which is what you mean when talking about

[filmscanners] Re: IV ED dynamic range... DYNAMIC RANGE!

2002-08-08 Thread Arthur Entlich
I would agree with your comments IF: 1) indeed the competitors spec usage could be PROVEN to be in opposition to either standard practice or was indeed a misuse of terms. Based upon the discussion which occurred here recently regarding the use of density range, dynamic range, etc., it seems

[filmscanners] RE: IV ED dynamic range... DYNAMIC RANGE!

2002-08-08 Thread Austin Franklin
Hi Arthur, Based upon the discussion which occurred here recently regarding the use of density range, dynamic range, etc., it seems fairly hopeless. Partially speaking, this is because there have not been agreed upon definitions or standards within the industry. Actually, that's not true.

[filmscanners] Re: Help with purchasing decision?

2002-08-08 Thread Sam A. McCandless
Thanks for this site Erik. I'm not sure what to make of these no-name reviews. Can you tell us who's behind the site and where they're coming from? It's less important, but I was disappointed in the Polaroid review because it's now so dated. Maybe they all are. Sam Hi! This site has a lot of

[filmscanners] Re: PS sharpening

2002-08-08 Thread Maris V. Lidaka Sr.
Yes it will be downsampled. To downsample by 2, one method would be to change the dimensions of the image to what you want, but UNCHECK Resample Image Click OK. This will change the resolution but will not be downsampled yet. Then Image - Image Size - change the resolution to 1/2 of the

[filmscanners] RE: IV ED dynamic range... DYNAMIC RANGE!

2002-08-08 Thread Laurie Solomon
Austin, I really don't want to dance, so I am not going to get into the he said, she said thing I am going to stick by my interpretation of what was said and how each of you has interpreted it. For now, I am not concerned with the maximum acceptable signal, given that I understand everyone's

[filmscanners] Re: IV ED dynamic range... DYNAMIC RANGE!

2002-08-08 Thread Arthur Entlich
Arthur Entlich wrote: Partially speaking, this is because there have not been agreed upon ^^ definitions or standards within the industry. That was supposed to read Practically speaking... Art

[filmscanners] Re: IV ED dynamic range... DYNAMIC RANGE!

2002-08-08 Thread Julian Robinson
I am only posting two replies to what has been posted during my overnight. This one is a short response to the nitty gritty of Austin's argument. The other includes replies in a single post to other points by everybody. There are two points I am addressing in this post: 1. Dynamic range is

[filmscanners] Re: IV ED dynamic range... DYNAMIC RANGE!

2002-08-08 Thread David J. Littleboy
Julian Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Dynamic range is a range, not a resolution No, it's a ratio; a value measured in dB. As such, it implies a resolution, namely the number of divisions it makes sense to divide (quantize) the range into. 2. Dynamic range is the range that the

[filmscanners] Re: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest for Fri 9 Aug,2002-Firnware

2002-08-08 Thread Khor Tong Hong
What is firmware? TH -=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=- Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 01:44:55 -0700 From: Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Michael, Welcome to the list. I can give you some views in regard to your purchase. I use both a Polaroid S4000+, which is the

[filmscanners] RE: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest for Fri 9 Aug,2002-Firnware

2002-08-08 Thread Robert Meier
TH, Firmware is the software that is running inside the scanner to make the scanner run. It controls all the internal stuff like steper motor, light source, etc. From a user's point of view the firmware is usually not important unless you need some bug fixes. Rob -Original Message-

[filmscanners] Re: IV ED dynamic range... DYNAMIC RANGE!

2002-08-08 Thread Julian Robinson
This is composed into a single post because I know that this topic is overexposed and frustrates many people. It frustrates me too, but it would be wrong not to try to correct misinformation which is propagated with such authority that it has succeeded in hijacking the moral and technical high

[filmscanners] RE: PS sharpening

2002-08-08 Thread Robert Meier
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then Image - Image Size - change the resolution to 1/2 of the Resolution shown, readjust the Document Size to what you want, click OK. It will be downsampled by 1/2. Continue doing this until the Resolution is what you desire. Excuse