Howard,
Photocal warns me when I update the drivers from my ATI Radeon 7500 on
XP to reprofile.
Steve Chambers
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 September 2002 20:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I have a Minolta Speed Scan which I bought before the Elite was
remaindered. How much better is the Elite SCSI than the Speed Scan apart
from the dust removal feature?
I have Vuescan but have not so far been able to get it to work as well as
the Minolta plug-in especially on dense
Hi David.
The Digital ROC and Digital GEM that are included with the scanners can only
be used at the time of the scan.
The Digital ROC plug in can be used with any digital image. There is no
Digital GEM plug in... yet.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: David
I'm thinking of buying one of these secondhand. This would be my first
film scanner. What would be the maximum price I should pay for one and
what is the quality like?
The LS-30 is pretty decent as far as optical quality is concerned. I
wouldn't pay more than $300 for it second-hand, though,
Is the glass replaceable? Anti-Newton ring glass does exist. Darkroom
enthusiasts often use it when they sandwich their negatives between glass in
enlarger negative carriers.
Brian
--
respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original
Further to my earlier post about the Nikon, I have also seen a Minolta
scan dual 2 being sold secondhand, how does this compare? As I am in the
UK our prices are somewhat more expensive, so what should I expect to
pay for this Minolta. I understand that it has no Digital Ice, but does
this
At 7:08 PM -0700 9/26/02, Arthur Entlich wrote:
Austin Franklin wrote:
I also have a dehumidifier in my lab...I can't say if that helps a lot or
not, but I don't have any dust problems on my stored film. On film I simply
leave lying around, perhaps.
Actually, a moderate humidity level
Topic: Minolta Elite scsi
I don't think there is much difference between the Elite and the Scan
Speed. at least from my experience with the scan speed and seeing other
people's scans with the Elite. It boils down to practice. There is so
much more noise in the shadows of minolta's plug in
I am and have been entirely satisfied with mine, and I primarily use Vuescan
with it. I paid $500 for a refurb before the new batch came out, so Major
Andras's suggestion of $300 tops sounds about right.
I have not had problems with the film strip feeder, but then I've scanned no
more than
Many of my films are old and scratched through poor processing labs, so I
have found Digital Ice (and Vuescan's IR-channel dust scratch removal)
invaluable.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Julian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:02 PM
Subject:
IM HARD OF HEARING - COULD YOU SPEAK A LITTLE LOUDER?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 4:45 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest for
Fri 27 Sep, 2002
HELLO ALL,
I AM ABOUT TO
Many manufacturers of glass slide mounts make anti-newton ring glass. If
you can get a few sample slide mounts, that is all you need. Gepe is a good
brand.
These work well in the Polaroid scanners.
If you are familiar with a focomat enlarger, try to duplicate what they are
doing. Otherwise,
The cause of Newton Rings is when a space is created between two finely
polished or glossy surfaces that is a very small space equal to or a
small multiple of white light wavelengths, which then cause interference
colors via the reflection between the surfaces. The best way to avoid
them
Hi Andre,
I've not been ignoring you. I wanted to contact someone off-list who
had a FS4000 to see if he might wish to comment, I left it with him.
I have only reviewed scans from this scanner, not having used it. I
would expect from the result I saw that the SS4000 was less noisy than
the FS
Austin Franklin wrote:
I'm curious if you have any references on that. I've not had any mold
growth, and it seems quite comfortable...and as I said, no camera, equipment
etc. problems at all. It's been a most palatable environment. The
dehumidifier is off during winter, probably from
I hate when that happens ;-)
This was supposed to read Running Win 98, I CAN'T use Firewire
Art
Arthur Entlich wrote:
Hmmm... This is news to me, but I haven't tried it. Running Win 98 I
can use Firewire. (annoying!)
Art
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't get my SS4000+ to run on
I'm curious if you have any references on that. I've not had any mold
growth, and it seems quite comfortable...and as I said, no
camera, equipment
etc. problems at all. It's been a most palatable environment. The
dehumidifier is off during winter, probably from October to April.
The Minolta Dual Scan II uses a six frame film carrier, and a four frame
slide carrier. The slide carrier is a bit of a kludge, in my opinion.
Regarding dICE, I own the Minolta Scanner in question, and I would say
it would be very nice if it did have dICE. Although it isn't quite as
bad as the
Count me as another very pleased LS-30 user. To get the best out of it, you need
to understand the capabilities of the hardware and the software -- but the same
is true of any scanner.
I have had no trouble with the motorised Strip Film Adapter (SA-20), but it does
not hold the film as flat as
Best of luck, and we look forward to your comments once you make a decision.
Art
Geoff Clack wrote:
Up to my neck at work, I need to put put my film scanner quest to one
side for a while. But I would like to thank all who have contributed,
on and off list. You've given me a lot of very
20 matches
Mail list logo
