Just want to make sure before buying one of these scanners that it does
work with Windows XP.
Has anyone had any compatibility problems with it and what software
version of the scan software will work with XP.
Thanks
Julian
Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I see part of the problem: Provia is shiny on both sides--no
visible emulsion on either side. Apparently the emulsion side is coated.
Maybe that's why the rings turn up. I wonder why Fuji does that.
The Provia here has a noticeably relief
Julian - I upgraded to Win XP yesterday and also to Nikon Scan ver
3.1.2. You can get this from the Nikon website. My Nikon Coolscan 3 seems
to work well with this setup. I previously ran Win 2000. The scanner does
not show in my Device Manager hardware list, but I think that is related to
Julian wrote:
Just want to make sure before buying one of these scanners that it does
work with Windows XP.
It's a SCSI device, it works fine.
Has anyone had any compatibility problems with it and what software
version of the scan software will work with XP.
The current version of
Hello All,
I'm having to correct some severely underexposed images, at least 2+ stops.
I have a SS4000 and Vuescan, Polaroid, and Silverfast. Which software
would give the results I need.
Sincerely,
Denise E. Kissinger
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus
you could probably use the drum mounting fluid successfully
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 5:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Avoiding Newton rings
As Laurie
As both you and Henning suggested, based upon review of my files, my
suggestion of mold growth at over 30% humidity was too conservative.
After doing a scan of my physical paper files, I found my memory had
failed me, as a reference by Kodak regarding preventing fungal growth on
films
Vuescan will get all the data that might still be available - from there
you'll have to deal with your preferred graphics program.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Denise Kissinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 2:04 PM
Subject: [filmscanners]
Matt Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
seems like vuescan might be useful, but here are my gripes. maybe
somebody can set me straight
my hardware is the nikon ls 8000.
I really liked Vuescan for the Epson 2450, but don't find it worth the
effort for the Nikon.
It seems to be very kludgy
I use it regularly with the LS4000 (and sometimes on the 8000 - which I
don't use much anyway).
Especially for bulk scanning thousands of slides, it does a much better job
of getting the exposure spot on.
And most of the time I still find it does a better job than the Nikon
software - which is
10 matches
Mail list logo
