[filmscanners] Re: Avoiding Newton rings

2002-10-01 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Paul writes: > Really? Have you scanned the same slide in an > anti-Newton glass mount and in conventional mount > and compared them? I've never scanned slides in glass mounts at all. For 35mm, either I scan them mounted without glass (usually plastic mounts), or I scan them in strips without g

[filmscanners] Re: SS4000--natural resolution

2002-10-01 Thread Arthur Entlich
Yes. The SS4000 has a natural resolution of 4000 dpi. which corresponds to the relative number of sensors per inch on the CCD. Art [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Does the SS4000 have a natural resolution at which setting it needs to do no > resampling? If so, is that at 4000 dpi? > > Stan > > >

[filmscanners] RE: Avoiding Newton rings

2002-10-01 Thread Paul D. DeRocco
Really? Have you scanned the same slide in an anti-Newton glass mount and in a conventional mount and compared them? I can easily see the difference on my LS-2000, which is only 2700dpi. -- Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco Paulmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: Anthony Atkielsk

[filmscanners] Re: Avoiding Newton rings

2002-10-01 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Laurie writes: > That may be an option; but I suspect that Anthony > would have the same objection to a fluid or oil > as he has to a powder. Absolutely. I'm paranoid enough about dust getting into the scanner (I'm not sure if I can clean it myself, as I can with the LS-2000). Fluids and powde