[filmscanners] Re: Autocropping (Was: Raw files in Vuescan)

2004-08-25 Thread Dieder Bylsma
I've been dealing with this little problem ever since I first picked up an LS-20, then upgraded to an LS-4000 w/roll/slide feeders. Short answer: if you're willing to accept NOT having 100% of scannable area in your final scan, you can easily set the crop area (for slide at least) to within a cert

[filmscanners] Re: Autocropping (Was: Raw files in Vuescan)

2004-08-25 Thread Ed Lusby
Hi Carlisle, I haven't worked through the cropping issues with the latest version of vuescan myself. I'm currently using 8.0.11 (8.0.13 is latest?), which leaves a small black border at the top (most of the time). It hasn't interfered with what I'm currently doing, so I've just ignored it. There a

[filmscanners] Autocropping (Was: Raw files in Vuescan)

2004-08-25 Thread Carlisle Landel
At 11:13 AM -0700 8/25/04, Ed Lusby wrote: [snip] >Auto cropping remains to be a problem in vuescan. The problem seems to vary >with scanner and certainly vuescan version, as Ed has made many recent >attempts to improve auto cropping lately. However, vuescan 8.0.4 remains >the best version for me

[filmscanners] Re: Raw files in Vuescan

2004-08-25 Thread Ed Lusby
I believe incorrect cropping can lead to autoexposure problems. If there is a significant area of black, for example, vuescan would tend to overexpose the raw scan, resulting in clipped highlights. You might check your scans for clipped highlights. If it's a small enough black area, it won't be si

[filmscanners] Raw files in Vuescan

2004-08-25 Thread Myles
I am just catching up on the recent exchanges concerning the uses of scanner versus Photoshop in making changes to images.These seem to relate to a problem puzzling me in using Vuescan to produce raw images. On a fairly big batch scanning exercise, due to a lack of consistency in the way the film