I second that emotion - I don't consider myself old at 55, nor a fogie, but
thank you - I just picked up a P&S digital for current use, but for fine art
and long term, I'm still using film.
Maris
Peter Marquis-Kyle wrote:
>
> And thanks (again) for keeping
> this list
> going -- the dwindling cre
Tony Sleep wrote:
> Throw it back at the service technician, it clearly hasn't been
> tested or
> repaired as properly as they stated. Unless there's a transit screw
> done up
> somewhere still :)
It's going back to the shop as soon as I can arrange it. No, it's not a transit
screw...
> I'd hazar
Peter Marquis-Kyle wrote:
> I'm annoyed to find it now produces files with a weird
> waviness. See the effect here:
> http://www.marquis-kyle.com.au/mt/000689.htm
Throw it back at the service technician, it clearly hasn't been tested or
repaired as properly as they stated. Unless there's a trans
I'll go along with the carrier moving the film being the problem. The
stepper motor should be just applying force to a platform that can only
move back and forth. It shouldn't be able to cause a wobble. The stepper
only has 4 unique patterns in how it is energized electronically, so you
would think
I'm not claiming to be an expert on scanner mechanics and electronics,
but to me this looks like it could come from several sources. From a
strictly mechanical basic, it could be something very wrong with the
mechanism that moves the film carrier, causing it to be shifted from
slide to side as it
At 7:58 PM +1000 3/10/05, Peter Marquis-Kyle wrote:
>In the hope that someone might still be reading this list, I'll ask
>a question:
>
>My Nikon LS-30 scanner [snip] was fitted with new scanning and
>focussing stepper motors [and] now produces files with a weird
>waviness. [snip] What could be cau
What happens? It will run hotter without the cooling affect of ICE.
On Mar 10, 2005, at 4:17 AM, Dieder Bylsma wrote:
> try using it without ICE and see what happens
>
> ---
> -
> Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL P
Peter
Actually the affect was quite attractive. Perhaps you have found a new
creative medium. In the future, only scan slides that will be enhanced
by your scanner.
In a more serious vein, it looks like the waviness is very smooth and
consistent. But, its affect did not seem to be present in t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Any chance the film is not being held securely and thus moving as the
> film is being scanned? Are you scanning a film strip or a mounted
> slide?
Thanks for the suggestion. I was scanning a film strip held in the FH-2 film
holder. I just tried scanning a mounted slide -
Lotus M50 wrote:
> Send the scan back to the repair shop (I assume it is Nikon) and ask
> them what's wrong.
Thanks, I will be taking the scanner back to the repairer (who is independent of
Nikon, but is authorised and recommended by the Australian Nikon importers) and
ask them to fix it properly.
Dieder Bylsma wrote:
> try using it without ICE and see what happens
Thanks for the suggestion, Dieder. I just did a test with and without ICE -- it
made no difference to the waves.
Any other ideas?
Peter Marquis-Kyle
-
Send the scan back to the repair shop (I assume it is Nikon) and ask
them what's wrong.
Peter Marquis-Kyle wrote:
>In the hope that someone might still be reading this list, I'll ask a question:
>
>The context: My Nikon LS-30 scanner has just come back from a long stay in the
>repair shop, where
try using it without ICE and see what happens
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
13 matches
Mail list logo
