Hi Roy,
Did you not have the ability to manually set the setpoints with this
software?
Regards,
Austin
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Roy Harrington
> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 11:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [filmsc
A while back I had a similar difficulty with some other scanning
software.
I found that by scanning the film as a positive rather than a negative
the software's notion of black/white points was much better --
especially in
the thin regions of the negative.
Roy
On Saturday, March 26, 2005, at 12:0
Hi Brad,
I think I would be satisfied for a while at least with 200ppi on the largest
prints I can make on a 2200 printer, let's say 12" x 16", which works out to
about 8 megapixels. Since Olympus has an 8 megapixel CCD on the E300
"Evolt" already, I am waiting for them to put it on an E-3, or wh
That would be 35mm if I did the math right. I'm guessing more than 5
years and less than 10. When my old 35mm developed a shutter timing
problem which I deemed not worth the money to fix (about a year or so
ago), I looked at the DSLR market and decided I just wouldn't be happy
with the results, so
So, is that "full frame" 35mm or full frame 645? 25 mp full frame
35mm size is a tall order. How long do you expect to have to wait for
such a thing?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>For me, the color mask has to go. Some sort of Foveon like technology is
>needed. I'd like to see the pixel spacing
For me, the color mask has to go. Some sort of Foveon like technology is
needed. I'd like to see the pixel spacing held to 6um and full frame,
so we are talking 6000x4333, or roughly 25Mpixel.
Brad Davis wrote:
>On 25/3/05 17:33, "Berry Ives" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Still waiting for
On 25/3/05 17:33, "Berry Ives" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Still waiting for the right DSLR for me...
>
> Berry
>
What will make a DSLR the "one" for you?
Just curious.
Brad
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL
From: "Austin Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
At this stage, you don't expand anything. You set your setpoint so that you
only USE the valid image data within the overall range. Therefore, say,
your scanner is 10 bits, and therefore gives you 0-1023...and your image
data occupies the
