Ken McKaba wrote:
I have been out of touch with photography for a few years
and recently dusted off my old Rolleiflex 6x6 to find
myself in the digital age. I am trying to make sense of
how serious photography is done in the 21st century.
I've brought the issue up to various people and
Ed Verkaik wrote:
From: Brad Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Someone must have a solution, must have found way to reduce the losses. The
only way I can see to reduce my losses is to write everything on my old HP
burner and make multiple copies - perhaps 4 copies each. That seems a bit
much as it
Berry Ives wrote:
I am getting PS-CS to replace PS 5 LE and Elements.
To support PS-CS, I am moving from Mac OS 9.1 to OS 10.3. I have also
decided to replace my Mac G4 with a G5.
I have been using a Minolta Scan Dual II, which does not support OS 10, so I
am considering the Scan Dual IV.
Bernie Kubiak wrote:
I've used my Epson 2450 to good effect scanning 645 and 6x6 negatives
and slides, so I would imagine the 3200 would do well.
How is this one:
http://www.epson.co.uk/sohoprod/imaging/scanner/perf4870/spec.htm
Compared to the 3200?
The specs give both a higher resolution
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone successfully installed an LS30 on XP? Any issues I should be
aware of? Up until now I've been using Win2K which was fine using the NT
drivers.
No problem at all. Used the latest drivers/Nikonscan from Nikon.
Scsi card was adaptec 2904.
Have since
david.gordon wrote:
I've not been here for a while, humour me if this has just been done to
death but there's no archive...
Need to replace a Polaroid SS4000. Googling around I see many people
complain that the Minolta 5400 produces fine lines it some scans,
sometimes, with some software.
Martin Greene wrote:
Rob
Take a look at a review of the Petax ist D by Michael Reichman of
Luminous landscape that just appeared. Unfortunately, it gets a
mediocre, just adequate, evaluation.
www.dpreview.com has a highly recommended verdict otoh.
(
sirius wrote:
- Image quality - sharpness: The Canon was definitely sharper and more
snappy on the same image. This could be (and I suspect it is) the
effect of
Digital Ice vs Canon Fare. I intend to do another test with Ice off
(unfortunately I scanned all my Canon samples with Fare on) The
Martin Reddington wrote:
This camera is now available in some shops in the US and Asia and there is a
lively debate on it in a special forum at
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1031. So far some problems
with flash exposure have been reported and the main complaint so far seems
to
