I've never personally encountered it, and not using glass mounts, I also
haven't needed it. I suspect companies which supply offset printers
might be a source. Perhaps other on the list will know.
Art
Bill Grimwood wrote:
> Thanks, where is this powder available.
>
>
> Bill
>
>
To avoid Newton Rings you have to avoid contact between the surfaces.
One way would be to increase the space between the film and the glass.
Of course, this is a bit of a catch 22 since the reason for using a
glass carrier is usually to flatten the film between the glass layers.
There is a pow
Neil Cotty wrote:
>
> One side effect though, maybe someone can tell me why this is happening.
> With a few slides, say 10%, I am getting this erm, multi-coloured circles
> and unusual shapes appearing on the slide. I guess it is the film itself
> perhaps slightly curved, and light playing tr
I have used two film scanners with USB version 1.1 interfaces, with both
a P-100 and Celeron 500 CPU (and between 64 and 600+ megs of memory). I
also previously had a SCSI interfaced film scanner. The image file
sizes ranged from 18 megs (2400 dpi/8 bit) to about 50 megs (2820 dpi/16
bit).
I'm not David, and I only represent myself, but, really, Raymond.
First off, the web site David pointed to has nothing to do with
Polaroid. They just happen to be one Canadian distributor of the
product.
Obviously, what happened is the refurb was in their supply chain from
when the SS4000 was
I know this is OT, but I was wondering if anyone has yet worked with the
Epson C-80 printer?
Back at Comdex here last March, Epson asked me for a list of things I
was looking for in a printer.
I told them my wish list was a 4 color, 3 picolitre printer which used
pigmented inks and separate cart
Just to clarify:
The only 35mm Minolta with IR channel is the Elite (and I suppose the
new Elite II).
I'm pretty sure the Polaroids do not have an IR channel, they certainly
don't use it for scratch repair, if there is one.
Art
"Maris V. Lidaka, Sr." wrote:
>
> I would look at scanners with "
I think the issue of dust and scratches needs to be explored in more
"detail" (excuse the pun). Although higher resolution would imply
capture of more detail (including dust and scratches), there are a
number of factors to keep in mind.
Although it may be true that using the same film scanner, m
The Minoltas get so confusing with their names. The one reviewed, just
to make sure you know one form the other, is the Dimage Multi Pro, which
is the newest medium format model (it also scans 35mm at a very high res
(I believe 4800 dpi). It also will be considerably more than the
current pricin
I'm not sure what this means exactly. Are you suggesting the person but
a Microtek version of the SS4000, or that if Polaroid should disappear,
a person could "change name plates" and attempt to get a warranty repair
through Microtek?
The SS4000 and Microtek version have different bodies, so it
No, until recently, I never heard of bubble problems in standard film
print or reproduction processes, but I've suspected it in terms of a
consumer grade scanner problem for some time.
The mysterious black dots that sometimes show up by the hundreds or even
thousands on a scan which appears to ha
Common wisdom is that scanning at the highest optical resolution and
then downsampling via a good program provides better results.
But, I would suggest the obvious, which is try both. There are a few
reasons why I suggest testing (and they are not to be snide). Different
scanners deal with lowe
Wire Moore wrote:
>
> Just got a SS4000 to replace an LS-2000. After a day of use I find the
> SS4000 is not as convenient as the LS-2000, but the scans are first rate! A
> significant improvement over the LS-2000. Here are some observations:
>
That was a great review and very valuable. Tha
"Owen P. Evans" wrote:
>
Art & Roger are taking the manufacturers to task in their theories;
> I'm just accepting the chemistry & physics.
Although I'm not sure your theory is correct or not, (I think the
bubbles either occur during manufacturing or during processing, and are
not the result
How very interesting!
I am now more sure of my theory. Either these bubbles occur during
manufacturing or processing, and are, I suspect, either introduced in
the base plastic or as the coatings are layered onto the film, or, the
processing creates some gas which doesn't fully migrate out of the
> "If, instead, the "dirt" is really chemical compounds or small partially dissolved
>pieces of emulsion, then ICE probably wouldn't help as infrared light would pass
>through it as easy as
> the film itself. If anyone with ICE notices this type of "dirt," you might report
>to us if ICE is of
Hi Phil,
Your problem may be bigger than the lack of Genuine Fractals.
What you have received is probably something called gray market goods.
They are very commonly sold among mail order retailers.
To briefly explain the difference between white market and gray market,
white market goods are t
Wow! I've heard of inflation but...
I think you've got an extra number there. I think it was $1450 on their
listing.
Art
"Shough, Dean" wrote:
>
> The Sprintscan 4000 Plus is now listed at eCost for $14500. See
> http://www.ecost.com/ecost/ecsplash/shop/detail.asp?dpno=962229
> Only changes
David,
Can you confirm if the rebate is available to Canadians from Canadian
addresses?
The coupon I saw via ecost only mentioned US purchases.
Also, do you have any idea why Canadian retailers are not moving from
their original "list" price of about $2200 CAN on the SS4000, while it
is selling
Alan Tyson wrote:
>
> David Lewiston [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote on Sun, 16 Sep 2001
> 13:57:58 -1000
> >
> > ...buy an enema bulb. I've used one for years (only for my
> negs and
> > tranies you understand) and don't have a dust problem.
>
> Alan T says
>
> Last time David L suggested this
My sincere condolences to anyone who had family or friends who were
touched by the tragedies which transpired in the US today.
My thoughts are with you.
Art
I would definitely pursue the Encarta infringement. Mr. Bill "deep
pockets" Gates needs a few lessons in etiquette, it would appear.
Art
Rob Geraghty wrote:
>
> Harvey wrote:
> > musical (intellectual) property is now a *very* hot legal
> > item.
>
> Only because it's worth billions to some v
Pat Perez wrote:
>
> Plenty of groups do work once and get paid forever. For example: inventors
> who license their patent, actors who earn residuals, songwriters, authors. I
> think anyone in a creative field basically has that benefit.
>
As an example, Phillips, to this day gets a fee on e
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
>
> However, it just might be the case that the images on a given site are not
> privately owned images but images in the public domain or that even if
> copyrighted they are royalty free images ( sort of like freeware) that
> anyone can use in any manner or for any purpo
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Nobody provided any documentation proving
> any peculiar risk to buying or developing film abroad.
I encourage children to ask questions when they need further information
or are being inquisitive. However, I have no patience for spoiled
children who ask "why" or de
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
>
> Austin writes:
>
> > What's illogical, is any discussion with you.
>
> You'll note that personal attacks are absent from my posts, but I do provide
> evidence for my assertions. In contrast, your posts are mostly personal
> attacks, but evidence for your assertio
There is a factual error in the review.
The reason they couldn't see any difference in resolution between the
Minolta Dual Dimage II (which they indicate has a resolution of 2438
dpi), and the Nikon rated at 2900 dpi, (as they mention in the body of
the article) is because the Minolta Dual Dimage
John Rylatt wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> FYI, I am in the US.
>
> Re the Polaroid 4000, I had a friend do a scan of a K64 test slide that I purchased
>many
> years ago. This slide has a black fabric background. A ball of white wool in front
>of the
> backgound exhibited a flare effect not present
Again, my experiences with Europe (and Africa) go back 20 years, BUT,
the storage I saw in many locales was dismal. The film was dusty and
the boxes faded, the stuff was rarely refrigerated. I had no idea if
the film was being rotated, sold, or even if the dates could be
trusted. I did find a f
Although my experience with European processing is 20 years old, I
received some of the worst processing I ever experienced there.
That included Kodak England, and Agfa Germany and Holland (there were
all slides). I had one batch, which I had addressed to be processed in
the US (and had paid for
I suppose one could always go into lycopodium farming...
(and regarding your memory lapse, perhaps you've been sniffing those
spores?)
;-)
Art
Tony Sleep wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2001 09:03:54 -0700 Karl Schulmeisters
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > Thanks I've always wondered what the bi
Then you either live in another universe, or you are severely sight
impaired, or both.
May I ask if you were to buy a used car, if you would buy "any" of a
specific year and model, regardless of the use on it, how it was
maintained, how much mileage it had, and how many accidents it was in?
I do
David,
Thank you for correcting me, but can you expand upon this a bit, because
I'm now somewhat confused.
Does the SS4000 CCD have three lines of sensors per color (in effect
nine lines) or does it use one CCD chip with three lines, one for each
color, or am I totally misunderstanding the desig
Obviously the Provia films are slides and the Superia are negs, just to
clarify.
Provia 400 is a miserable film (also sold as Sensia II 400). It is
grainy, has poor color, often shifting very cyan, and is too contrasty
in bright light, which is the only way to get decent color out of it,
which s
Actually this DNA stuff is slow compared to the theoretical quantum
mechanical systems they are working on. I think Douglas Adams (RIP) of
Hitchhiker's Guide fame, wasn't far off with his improbability drive ;-)
Art
Tim Atherton wrote:
>
> I want to know when they are going to get those DNA ba
Pat Perez wrote:
>
> Good luck getting a DNA computer to run WinNT4 or
> SCSI.
>
They have helped to damage my DNA (Sleepless nights, poor nutrition,
emotional breakdowns, etc,... ;-))
Art
If I'm not mistaken, Nikon has been using GaAs if photo meters for some
time now...
(Or at least did...)
Art
Jeff Moore wrote:
>
> 2001-09-05-15:38:34 Stan McQueen:
> > (It has been said that Gallium Arsenide--GaAs--is the semiconductor
> > material of the future, and it always will be.)
>
>
Austin Franklin wrote:
>
> > I believe I heard that Motorola just developed a CPU that runs at, not 7
> > gigahertz but SEVENTY gigahertz.
>
> Just think, you can browse the Internet and get your eMail (at 56k) with
> your 70GHz CPU...
Well, that's true for now, but it is a bit like saying "a n
O.T., but darn interesting:
Maybe I'm dreaming, but if I heard what I think I did, the whole
computer industry is about to start a new ball game.
I believe I heard that Motorola just developed a CPU that runs at, not 7
gigahertz but SEVENTY gigahertz.
If that's true, and it can be produced in
Winsor Crosby wrote:
>
> >
> From the Polaroid page for the SS120: (10,000 X 3 = 30,000)>
>
> Since the banding problem has not turned up with the Polaroid
> implementation I don't think that the three row CCD idea is something
> that does not work in practice. It may or may not depending on
Austin Franklin wrote:
>
> When I got my SS4k, I wanted a cover for it...you know, one of those plastic
> covers that you would expect a precision optical device would, if not come
> with, would be available from the manufacturer...so when not in use, it
> wouldn't allow any dust to get inside
I appreciate all the feedback I have received in regard to the "lazy CCD
sensors" and the implication of one Minolta staff that perhaps I should
"move up" to a more professional scanner if I had such high expectation
(of one which didn't suffer from this problem and severe green channel
noise).
ote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 01:30:10 -0700 Arthur Entlich ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>
> > Seriously, if you have only one system
> > which can never go down you had better be running Linux (;-))...
>
> Er, not necessarily. I am trying to teach myself rudimentary
It is probably the weak point in the process, but it was a matter of
pragmatics.
I did try to minimize the "damage" by using a Navitar Gold lens, which
is one of the best there are for projection. Still, I would agree it
degraded the images. Trying to see a full image with a loupe,
especially w
I've bought neither, my comment about purchasing a Leica was a joke. I
just don't think I could afford to belong to another cult :-)
Art
Austin Franklin wrote:
>
> > I have no comments of Leica rangefinders, other than that I've rarely
> > gotten along well with anyone who tells me they own one
This posting is being repeated in both this and the Scan@leben group.
As those who have been following my threads know, I'm currently using a
Minolta Dual Dimage II scanner, and I'm in discussions with Minolta
after my first unit was defective.
My second unit also suffers from duff or lazy pixe
Steve Greenbank wrote:
>
> I never claimed their examples had any aesthetic quality, but I do think the
> software appears to be pretty impressive.
>
> Save image 25 or 26 and see if you can get anywhere near the processed
> example they show you.
>
> Steve
>
I took a look at this web site a
No, I didn't, nor would I. I've yet to have a complaint by anyone about
my use of Nikon lenses.
As I think I've posted before, I did a double blind shoot out with Leica
and Nikon lenses (a 28mm 2.8 wide angle, a 135mm 2.8 tele and the 50mm
1.4 normal). Each image was shot with one of these thre
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
>
> Arthur writes:
>
> > How do you know upgrading to an LS-4000 (even
> > if it had SCSI interfacing) wouldn't bring your
> > system down?
>
> Because I already have all the necessary software installed to address the
> scanner.
>
Yes, but some of the modules of th
Austin Franklin wrote:
>
> > Sometimes, if we are very lucky, we find our soul mates!
> >
> > I hear wedding bells. ;-)
> >
> > Art
>
> Art,
>
> I am glad for you that luck has finally come your way!
>
> ;-)
Please don't tell my wife! If she found out I bought a Leica she'd most
certainly
Moreno Polloni wrote:
>
>
> The camera store I deal with in Vancouver is selling the SS4000 for $1729,
> and that's their regular price.
I suspect the $2199 CAN price is an anomaly due to their not getting
word of the new pricing.
However, even $1729 CAN is almost $1100 US after rebate but i
Sounds like your scanner just needed "a breather" ;-)
Art
Rob Geraghty wrote:
>
> I took the case of the SS4000 apart today and used a photographic brush
> and canned air on the sensor. I couldn't see anything blocking the sensor
> before I started, but the important thing now is that the scan
David,
I commend you for revealing the methodology that Polaroid uses in
determining the reported OD of your SS4000 scanner. I think it goes a
long way toward de-mystifying the process, and also provides other
manufacturers with a possible structure to work from.
I have only one question, based
This is getting downright silly. How do you know upgrading to an
LS-4000 (even if it had SCSI interfacing) wouldn't bring your system
down? I don't see how you can even risk leaving the room is your whole
livelihood is dependent upon your system being 100% reliable.
I don't have a "production s
Hersch Nitikman wrote:
>
Challenger's destruction taught them that they
> had not thought of everything, but they tried.
> Hersch
>
I think this statement might go down in the annals of "understatement of
the century".
Art
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
>
> You make the same mistake that many microcomputer companies make, including the
> big ones like Microsoft. Their employees have never dealt with true
> mission-critical systems, in the mainframe or NASA sense (for example),
Oh my god, we are dealing with rocket
Sometimes, if we are very lucky, we find our soul mates!
I hear wedding bells. ;-)
Art
Austin Franklin wrote:
>
> > Austin writes:
> >
> > > You examined a 35mm slide on a light table
> > > and concluded that there are no blown highlights
> > > or blocked shadows on it?
> >
> > No, I saw detai
What the hell is it with Leica owners. I understand Paxil is effective
for obsessive-compulsive disorder. ;-)
Art
Austin Franklin wrote:
>
> > Hi Anthony,
> >
> > Good to see you on here. Presumably things will get a lot quieter on the
> > Leica list now...!?
> >
> > Tony, stand by for a lot mo
> mahimahi wrote:
>
> Looking for suggestions as to the best way keep the film flat while
> scanning. Thought about glass mounts but I do not mount my images as
> the mounts tent to crop the image.
>
> have both a Nikon LS1000
>
>
For most scanners film flatness is not critical due to adequa
Moreno Polloni wrote:
>
> > on 8/27/01 2:06 PM, Moreno Polloni at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > In fact, after
> > >> removal of the $200 US rebate on both sides, our price here is just
> > >> double that of the US. Is that silly or what?
>
> Did I really write that?
Don't you even reme
> The public has been very well brainwashed with respect to computer equipment.
> Not only do people not find it odd that they are expected to junk their
> computers every year or so and buy completely new hardware and software, but
> they've actually been convinced that this is the way things are
775 US if you get all the taxes refunded). US
buyers get a refund of our goods and services tax, and in some cases the
provincial sales tax upon return to the US. (Don't ask me why!)
Art
Rob Geraghty wrote:
>
> "Arthur Entlich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > An
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
>
> Pat writes:
>
> > Well, if ICE isn't a critical requirement, why
> > not look at the Polaroid (or the Canon, which
> > has an equivalent to ICE, and scans at 4000
> > dpi) which several people have suggested?
>
> Because I understand that it has less dynamic range
Laurie, please understand that although my comments where "attached" to
your posting regarding cost of memory, it was not specifically directed
to you.
I certainly agree that most currently used memory has considerably
reduced prices, although rarer forms or obsolete ones have become rather
expen
Moreno Polloni wrote:
>
> > Not true in this case. Nikon simply decided to drop SCSI and Windows NT
> support
> > for their newer scanners. This was a marketing decision, not a technical
> > decision, and no technical advantage accrues from it.
>
> That's not true. How about plug and play? T
Although I very much empathize and support your concerns about planned
obsolescence in computer equipment, no matter how well it fuels
capitalism and environmental havoc, I have to say that your demands
aren't completely reasonable, and you seem to really be fighting with
yourself in your refusal
Mike Duncan wrote:
>
> >Yes, indeed lack of focusing on some scanners can lead to unacceptably
> >soft scans.
> >
> >It is important to thoroughly read your instruction manual as to how and
> >during what point in the scanning process, the focusing is accomplished.
> >
>
> Also, it's important
Oh oh--
This is a real can of worms, and most opinions are based upon the
specific use people have in mind.
Video has been around now for what, over 20 years? Did it kill film in
the motion picture industry? Certainly not yet... the theaters are
still using light projection systems, and most
Austin Franklin wrote:
>
> > Of course, the loupe-heads will be
> > unhappy with a 100 dpi image, but, if it is a large format print, only
> > bad manners says you should be scrutinizing it at 8", anyway.
>
> Or, that's where you just happen to be standing ;-)
If circumstances place you in an
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
>
> I just bought 256 MB Dimms for $47US each a few weeks ago and the prices
> went down since then. Check out www.champaigncomputer.com for RAM, CPU and
> other prices. They typically have very good prices on most items. Even if
> you do not buy from them their prices
Scanner design differs with each model and brand. In order to have a
successful fixed focus scanner fro film use, a lengthy the light path is
required, or a very bright light source which allows for a rather
stopped down lens. The reason is because we are dealing with a highly
"macro" situation
Great commentary Ian. I think sometimes we take the numbers too
seriously and don't look at results. Of course, the loupe-heads will be
unhappy with a 100 dpi image, but, if it is a large format print, only
bad manners says you should be scrutinizing it at 8", anyway.
Of course, I do understand
What is the best car, regardless of budget?
Well, that depends if you are driving 4 kids to school everyday or like
to impress the ladies (or gents) on a Saturday night, or you want a car
that has spare parts easily available in your local.
Do you need medium format? Do you need bulk scanning?
dbdors wrote:
>
> I am in need of a film scanner. As I have a low budget, I have
> narrowed my choices down to the Canon 2710, the Acer 2720S, the
> Acer 2740s or the Minolta Scan Dual II.
>
> My first Choice is the Acer 2720 as it is the cheapest. My second
> choice is the Acer 2740. Altho
Pat Perez wrote:
>
> I've been looking forward to getting PS E for awhile
> now. I think I'll be buying the Epson 2500 dpi scanner
> coming out in October, so I'll wait, since it is
> bundled.
My question is O.T. but I have to know...
How the heck did you manage to find out about an Epson pr
As some of you know who have been reading my threads, I have been
through two Minolta Dimage Scan II scanners within the last few weeks,
without being able to get one which works up to the expected level.
It would appear I have gotten the ear of the upper Minolta people (at
least here in Canada)
Well, we're getting really off topic here, but if you have any knowledge
how Corbis operates with its photographers (which is a Bill Gates
company) you would know that he is not in it for the fun, philosophy, or
love of the art. And as to the limited time... all that was needed was
more scanners
There are a number of traditional reasons why MF films have been used in
wedding and portrait photography. In the not so distant past, a lot of
touch up work was done directly on the negs, and MF allowed for this
more simply.
Further the usually square format allowed for variable cropping, and
Karl Schulmeisters wrote:
> So for a 20 year archive, I would print to 2 CDRs and keep the original negs
> in a cool-dry place (in essence that is what Corbis is doing with the
> Betteman archive).
>
>From what I've read, Corbis actually throwing up their hands and
accepting defeat. The vas
"Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)" wrote:
>
> Take a look at ACDSee
> http://www.acdsystems.com/english/products/acdsee/
>
Always nice to see our homeboys promoted ;-)
Art
Rob Geraghty wrote:
>
> "Arthur Entlich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Tony Sleep wrote:
> > > saturation, contrast). This has worked far, far better than anything
> else :
> > > prints are now as close to the screen image as is possible withi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 08/09/2001 8:22:14 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> << The second Dimage Scan has fewer bad elements, but it appears to suffer
> from a wide area of miscalibrated elements. I am still trying to
> determine if this prob
Would scanning a Fuji Superia 100 ISO neg of a properly exposed 18%
Kodak gray card be likely to "stress" a scanner? Tried several
different black and white points, although it didn't need any adjustment
based upon the histogram.
I'm about to do some more tests to see if the problem isn't the
ca
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 08/07/2001 12:40:48 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> << No, not damaged. These sorts of horribleness are revealed when you try and
> use a scanner beyond its capabilities. You are exposing behaviour which
> would normal
Al Bond wrote:
> This is all very familiar. When I got my Scan Elite 18 months ago these sort of CCD
> defects were very obvious in the green channel with only very little gamma and white
> point adjustments. I got it repaired under warranty and it seemed much improved
> (although not perfect
Rob Geraghty wrote:
>
> "Arthur Entlich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am very intrigued by the number of people on this list how have color
> > deficiency. Does anyone know how common this is in the general
> > population (or even just the male popu
Not to be a smart @ss, but how about film?
I don't know that any of the current storage media will either be around
or will survive 20 plus years from now.
I'm unfamiliar with Iomega's optical drives. I know they make mainly
magnetic drives and rebadge some CD-R drives. DVD RAM and it's kin ar
I am very intrigued by the number of people on this list how have color
deficiency. Does anyone know how common this is in the general
population (or even just the male population)?
I also find it interesting that a very color demanding field
(Photography with interest in digital scanning) would
Norman Unsworth wrote:
>
> How do the bad elements in the CCD evidence themselves?
>
I'm sorry to report my second Minolta Dual Scan II is going to need
replacement as well. Not only does it have a few "funky" elements in
each color, (more on that later), but today I scanned some neg film
(
Just to make sure it doesn't appear I'm ignoring you, I was going to
answer that I don't use Vuescan and so others who do might be more apt
to give you that info accurately, and I note that is indeed what
happened. I think Tony Sleep's message is probably what you're looking
for.
I hope his comm
I recently had my Minolta Dual II replaced by Minolta, after only owning
it a week. The second one has lower "noise" in the shadow areas than
the first.
The first had a lot of green noise in the dense areas (on slides) which
I noted lessened quite a bit using Vuescan. I haven't tested the new
I assume this image is on negative film, because if it is on slide film,
the detail is gone forever if it isn't visible on the film.
If it is on neg, your detail is probably there, but the overexposure of
the whites makes for a very dense area on the neg. You need to expose
for those areas while
If anyone else is on the scan@leben list... are you having problems?
All my messages to it bounced yesterday and I got no mail from it today.
Code red strikes?
Art
I just read the apparent real reason for the pull of the Mac support...
I wrote this message literally just before reading that message. I
wasn't too far off...
Art
Has anyone been in contact with or received a comment about this from
Ed? I know he is off list (or was), but this seems a
I feel you pain. It is often so hard to know which component to target
as being at fault.
Some monitors might prove sensitive to voltage fluctuations, causing
image shrinkage and jerking. If you live in a place where there are
electrical "brown outs" or anomalies due to stressed energy sources,
The main problem here is that manufacturers use dpi or ppi to refer to
the number of physical elements or density on the CCD, it tells us
nothing about what happens along the route and afterward in terms of
real output. Typically an lpi rating is a result of actual output from
a resolution chart,
Do not assume that all reconstituted images are created equal.
Short cuts are sometimes taken in translating the file back into an
uncompressed image which might speed up decompression, but not represent
the full nature of the image.
Art
Rob Geraghty wrote:
>
> "Dana Trout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
>
> I am arguing that people should not get their expectations up as to the
> nature of the protection that copyright registration provides, the ease of
> enforcement, the extent of the costs of insuring against copyright
> protection in terms of time and money, and what t
Dear Terry,
As a regular reader and contributor to this list, I wish to thank you
for providing this very useful, helpful, and concisely written
information.
Terry Carroll wrote:
>
>
> In the US, as in most countries, you get a copyright in the work as soon
> as you create the work; technical
> I seem to get odd effects when scanning B&W negs using ICE on my Nikon 4000 - like
>posterization . I vaguely remember someone once telling me this happened - can
> someone tell me why and if theirs a way around it other than just not using ICE
>on B&W negs?
> Thanks ,
> Steve
Dig
601 - 700 of 1406 matches
Mail list logo
