:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian D.
Plikaytis
Sent: 12 January 2002 14:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Nikon Scan question
I was wondering if I could address as simple question tot eh group about
Nikon Scan, version 3.1.2. In the previous versions, the LCH editor gave
I was wondering if I could address as simple question tot eh group about
Nikon Scan, version 3.1.2. In the previous versions, the LCH editor gave
access to red green and blue. In the latest version this editor is set in
the lightness-hue mode. I cannot find a setting where I can return to RGB
Hi,
I was wondering if I could ask a question of the Nikon Scanner folks. I
am preparing to install version 3.1.2 on my W2K machine. I know you are
supposed to uninstall the previous version and then run the regsweep
program. My question is the following: I did not get a regsweep.exe file
The site http://www.nikontechusa.com says this is for Windows XP. Did you
find that it improved your Win2K version's performance?
thanks,
Brian
--
respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Enoch's Vision, Inc.
For your information, this email had a virus attachment detect by Norton
Virus Scanner:
Date: 12/8/2001, Time: 19:54:32, Administrator on D6XSD601
The email attachment Account.zl3 is infected with the W32.Magistr.39921@mm
virus.
The file was repaired.
Date: 12/8/2001, Time: 19:54:32,
Definitely. I agree.
Brian
--
respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:05 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Re:
actually polar coordinates might be more applicable in this case.
Brian
--
respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 12:55 AM
discussed the problem with Nikon.
Nothing yet are done to solve the problem
Best Regards Mikael Risedal
From: Brian D. Plikaytis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 19:49
Maybe I'm not looking at the images correctly but the _entire_ Nikon 4000
frame looks out of focus. Is this a fair test - to compare an out-of-focus
Nikon scan to an in-focus Canon scan?
Brian
--
respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
a owner of 2 Nikon
scanner
LS2000 and LS 4000, they have the same problem.
Best regards
Mikael Risedal
From: Brian D. Plikaytis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 17:32
I am in the U.S. and I can state that Genuine Fractals did come bundled with
the scanner. The online documentation (on the CD) was not informative and in
some cases erroneous. I eventually had to go to their website to look at the
documentation there to understand how to work the software.
Brian
Tom,
I find your comments intriguing. Could I ask a few questions? I find
that when I sharpen using Photoshop tools, there is oftentimes an artificial
dark or light line (sharpening artifact) that appears at the juxtaposition
or boundary of a dark and light area. This causes me to spend a
Todd,
I have experimented with the radius setting. However, when I reduce the
radius enough to eliminate the halo, I do not get much sharpening. Also,
this white line (halo, if you will) does not occur everywhere - just certain
areas where a black boundary is net to a light area. At least it
If you want a description/review of this tool, the current issue of Photo
Techniques (Sept/Oct issue, page 54) has a one-pager on this product. This
issue should be available at a well-stocked newsstand.
Brian
--
respond to [EMAIL
The FAA announced a number of years ago that it was upgrading all checked
baggage x-ray machines to improve the ability to detect bombs and other
types of stuff. Prior to this announcement Kodak never admitted that the
existing x-ray machines would fog film. With the new machines Kodak did
I'm running a LS 4000 on a Dell Win 2K machine. Can you be more specific
about what is going on? Silly question but you are using Nikon Scan 3.1 aren't
you? Also, if you have Photoshop, try addressing the Nikon software through
Photoshop and see if you don't get further along with your
I'm using the Epson 1640 with it's transparency adapter to scan my 4x5 black
and white negs. I find it is doing a fairly good job and I am getting output
that surpasses my darkroom prints. However, I did find that for a given
negative, I got much more out of the shadow areas with Vuescan as it
?
Is the Vuescan multi sample scanning on the Epson multiple pass or single
pass?
Pat
- Original Message -
From: Brian D. Plikaytis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm using the Epson 1640 with it's transparency adapter to scan my 4x5
black
and white negs. I find it is doing a fairly good job
4, and I just need to remember to
put
it back in slot 3, to confirm this *theory*.
You *do* have a PC, don't you? Not a Mac?
Jawed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian D.
Plikaytis
Sent: 05 August 2001 03:06
To: [EMAIL
Hello,
I have just purchased and am experimenting with the Nikon Coolscan 4000
ED scanner. I have the software upgrade (3.1) and when I use the software
stand-alone (outside of Photoshop) I get images from slides and things run
pretty well. This evening I tried to scan my first color
20 matches
Mail list logo
