uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ----
>> Bruce wrote
>> I just shot a bunch of snapshots with this new consumer 400 speed film.
>>
>> I just wanted to pass along a note that it gives wonderful scans (on my
>> Nikon 8000). This film is rather contrasty for a color neg
unchy highlights and blacks and very fine grain for a 400 film. This film
kind of has the look of "chromes" with the latitude of negative.
I just thought I'd mention it as a new choice that's easy to find at the
supermarket and not too expensive. I was very pleasantly surprised.
Please, enough already with the dynamic range argument. I want to learn
about scanners.
Thanks.
-bruce
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or &#
lm)do
not exhibit the problem.
Bruce Burnett
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Austin Franklin
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 8:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Black and white scans
onLS4000EDandotherissues
Hi Todd,
&
>Anyone know what has happened to epson-inkjet list yet? Six days down now.
I'm also not getting any of the Yahoo groups: Piezo, Archival Color,
Digital BW , etc. Perhaps my ISP is balking? They need the bandwidth
for the spam
The Bar coded label on the outer cardboard box. However, save copies
of that and the original receipt as there is also a discount on the
Silverfast upgrade.
Regards,
Bruce
>On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:25:49PM -0500, Bruce Kinch wrote:
>> Mine too.
>>
>> Likewise!
I've mostly lurked here since last fall because I've been pursuing a
sabbatical project in digital printing. I've learned a lot by doing
so, and some of that knowledge has now been put to use. I am truly
indebted to all on the list.
I've just put the finishing touches on an exhibition of 31 Piezo
> >> In their zeal to make totally electronic cameras, Canon eliminated
>>> the sprocket that counts eight holes per frame, replacing it with an
>>> infrared sensor. I'd suggest that plays a role your "nonstandard"
>>> spacing.
>
>Ah. I see. What a PITA. :-(
>
>Having said that, it looks to be
>I'm having problems with grain with the Polaroid SS120. This can be
>seen in the sample at:
>
>http://www.spirer.com/images/grain.jpg
>
>This is from a 6x7 neg scanned at 2880, unsharpened. I get far less
>grain with my Epson 1640 and am wondering what is going on. The
>original neg is Tri-
> >> Surely, the frame spacing has no relationship to the make of
>>> film. It should be a standard 8 sprocket holes. Any variance
>>> has to come from the camera. Some very cheap ones don't even
>>> register the sprocket holes and vary spacing throughout a film.
>
>Both rolls were shot on
make AN glass carriers for years, using "non-glare" picture framing
glass on top, and plain below, with a tape hinge. Amazing how much it
improves sharpness in conventional printing. Probably do the same in
a scanner. In fact I may make one for my 4000SS before David does:-)
--
Bru
>I have been notified by my Professional lab and the Professional
>Photographers of America not to send processed or unprocessed film through
>the US mail due to the new equipment they are using.
>
>Its is best to have all film, "hand inspected". rather than go through the
>machines. I understand
I have one computer with a Matrox video card that will go to sleep and not
wake up if I use an Open GL screensaver. So I don't, and it works fine.
Bruce Burnett
> with an
> image about 38mm square? From a Baby Rollei, or from a Brownie
Starflash?
Sorry, more explicitly 22mm high and 22mm wide (32mm diagonal). I have
no idea camera what was used and the photographer is no longer with us
to find out. Regardless I will have to make do with what the sca
image but the owner of the slides (family!) don't mind if I
forcibly have to crop due to the scanners limitations.
Any suggestions on the best practice welcomed.
Bruce Roberts.
ALLM Rose wrote:
>
> I would really appreciate some help. I am trying to profile my Epson
> 2000P printer using Monaco EZcolor 1.6. To do this I must print a
> (Monaco-supplied) profiling image on the 2000P, tape a
> (Monaco-supplied) target just below the printed image, and scan the
> whole
ed PS
upgrade from LE to the full version.
Thanks very much and if this topic has been overly discussed on the list,
feel free to contact me off-list.
Bruce J
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
he LE
version qualify as an upgrade to the full version?
Thanks very much and to keep this filmscanner related, I'll be making prints
from my LS-2000 scans. :-)
Bruce J
of
settings: contrast, brightness, color balance, white point etc. This is
mainly wildlife images with Fuji NPH. I would appreciate any input on
suggested settings for this situation, or perhaps a link to any websites
that show examples.
Thanks in advance,
Bruce J
gure out how these things are
> supposed to work.
I wish that they would sort out some broader standards too! But new
standards are sure to bring new problems... Oh, why do we do this??? >:^0
Cheers,
Bruce Roberts.
===
You'd
think they'd assume everybody would have UDMA drives in todays machines. Its
all on by default in Win2k.
You probably knew all this but it doesn't hurt to mention it as not many end
users know this one.
Cheers,
Bruce Roberts.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shough, Dean
> Sent: Thursday, 28 September 2000 5:33 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Vuescan/Old Kodachrome Unable to Focus
>
>
> > I have no idea why Nikonscan worked, but it did (I hardly
cs.
I'll wait a few months longer before I make my own assessment I guess. I've
only had the printer about 3 months. Also, the new paper is due out
soon(ish) and that may help alleviate the problem. Needless to say I'm
keeping my paper purchases to a minimum for a while!
Bruce.
> ---
s when they where
getting faster (24x Maybe?) but didn't have any dampening mechanisms which
seem common today. It would make one hell of a racket with about a quarter
of the CDs I put in it. Sounded like a real imbalance problem (it was sent
back under warrantee). That's my
that
this lazy behaviour has prevented some of the problems.
Bruce Roberts.
Australia.
PS. You live in a beautiful part of the world. I was there last year and
loved it!!!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jo Ann Snover
&
r am I not
examining the prints closely enough over time?
Bruce Roberts.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 September 2000 7:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: how does the mailin
You can't clean scratches off.
...and you never really get *all* the dust, grime, grease, hairs, etc. off.
Try ICE. It's pretty impressive to see a comparison. I'm looking forward to
4000dpi scanners with it...
Bruce.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTEC
Ice3 technology -
later this year according to their site.
Bruce Roberts
Australia.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 September 2000 5:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
28 matches
Mail list logo
