The fact is, Epson ink-jet printers are an incredible bargain, even
allowing for the high ink and paper prices. Ten years ago I would have
found it inconceivable that I could get photo-quality reproduction from a
printer costing under $300.
If you get good service in addition to an incredible bar
> Not sure what you're doing that's "extreme", but with my Sprintscan 35/ES
> (same as "plain" 35 I think), using Ed's Vuescan with the scan count set
> to eight passes, noise in the shadows is reduced quite a lot, and the time
> it takes isn't too horrible so long as I'm only doing a few slides.
> Charles, are you Mac or PC?
>
> Just thought I'd ask as I'm contemplating a Mac one for myself.
I use a Mac for graphics work. If you go for the Canon, I hope you'd give
us a report. If I go for the Canon, I'll do likewise.
--CP
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Michael Moore wrote:
> Where's this thing for sale at?
I found it at www.yourphotos.com. The URL that takes you direct to the
Canon FS 4000 (assuming the site allows deep linking) is:
http://yourphotos.ssdonline.com/category.cfm?CategoryID=5&cfid=453757&cftoken=255739
Note
dust, and it costs less than any other 4000
dpi scanner, it's a tempting product.
Anyone else own one? Or shall I be the first to jump in and enjoy all the
usual problems associated with buying a new product that still has bugs in
it?!
--Charles Platt
Having only joined this list recently, I don't know if there's been
discussion on Polaroid vs. Nikon 4000 dpi scanners. Is the list archived
anywhere? If not, can someone tell me if a definitive conclusion was
reached regarding these two scanners?
Incidentally as I understand it the Polaroid is r
