RE: filmscanners: Minolta Scan Multi

2000-11-21 Thread Dynax N
Hello list members There is a gentleman here in this list uses the SS35+ to scan MF film (6x45 and 6x6). He modified the negative holder and adjusted the focus distance of the lens. The SS35+ can scan 3.5x3.5 frame in one pass. -Khanh --- Clark Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, people!

Re: Kodak RFS 3600 (was: filmscanners: Side Step, Have a question)

2000-11-16 Thread Dynax N
--- Bob Shomler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They have a quick start guide, but no manual. It is a .pdf. I LIKE paper in this respect. Is it too large to print? If you have any specific questions, feel free to e-mail me. I read an inquiry some time back asking if it could accept an

Re: filmscanners: Slide scanners

2000-11-10 Thread Dynax N
the choice for you. If you are an amateur and just wish to produce good quality 8 x 10" prints, you do not need the top end, and the others I have suggested might give you several hundred dollars (as many as $800 extra, in fact) left in your pocket for other toys. Art Art I'll have

Re: Scanner $1500 selection ?

2000-10-23 Thread Dynax N
Ed. If you need 4000 dpi, then the Polaroid SprintScan 4000 will do a nice job for you. If you need less resolution, then the Minolta Scan Dual II is probably good enough. Regards, Ed Hamrick Are you saying that you would pick the Scan Dual II instead of the LS2000? I understand the

How is the Kodak new RFS 3600 Scanner?

2000-10-11 Thread Dynax N
Hello list Is it out yet? I read about it in kodak homepage. Does anyone know anything more about this scanner? It seems like a great scanner for its price. Thanks -Khanh = ..("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._ " Calculate, Inovate, Try, Try, Try `6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`)