[filmscanners] RE: Foveon

2002-03-15 Thread John's ntl account
Don't seem to be able to find this in the OED. Are you sure? -Original Message- << A Forest is a haphazard place with trees chaotically distributed amongst undergrowth. A Woods is a place only with trees and is typically a cultivated mono-culture of tree type. >> -

[filmscanners] RE: VueScan FIY (was: Polaroid's future)

2002-03-13 Thread John&#x27;s ntl account
So you don't like him, is that the message? -Original Message- snip <> Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate)

[filmscanners] RE: Question for 2450 owners

2002-03-11 Thread John&#x27;s ntl account
But for proofing purposes you can put your 35mm slides/negs in the scanner just in their see through bags. I can do a whole film in two scans like this. I don't really use 35mm now, but it's a good way of proofing all those old boxes of negatives from your yoof. Unless of course you are a yoof. -

[filmscanners] RE: profiling

2002-03-10 Thread John&#x27;s ntl account
I know from offline conversations I've had with one or two of you that - for those of us who are not professional - the business of scanner/monitor/printer profiling is a bit of a problem. I eventually used material I found on http://www.computer-darkroom.com/, but I've got an Epson 1290, which

[filmscanners] RE: Flattening negatives

2002-03-09 Thread John&#x27;s ntl account
Books -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Edward P. Richards Sent: 09 March 2002 14:56 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] Flattening negatives Any good tips for flattening negatives before you scan them? When I get negatives back

[filmscanners] Sorry!

2002-02-25 Thread John&#x27;s ntl account
Sorry abt the posting everyone. It was meant to be an email reply to Art -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John's ntl account Sent: 25 February 2002 12:15 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] RE: I hardly dare mention Hard D

[filmscanners] RE: I hardly dare mention Hard Drives

2002-02-24 Thread John&#x27;s ntl account
nt upon how you go about fixing the problem, and occasionally the patch can cause your system to hang, and you may need to contact the manufacturer of your motherboard or the drive company. Art John's ntl account wrote: > > But... some of you demonstrated recently you knew a lot about the

[filmscanners] RE: I hardly dare mention Hard Drives

2002-02-22 Thread John&#x27;s ntl account
Thanks very much for the replies, chaps. I have been using the wrong file system, I am informed, and with the right file system the other 36 Gb appears like magic. Thanks Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROT

[filmscanners] I hardly dare mention Hard Drives

2002-02-22 Thread John&#x27;s ntl account
But... some of you demonstrated recently you knew a lot about them, and I have a (scanner related) problem. I bought a Maxtor 4D040H hard drive as a slave to my main hard drive so as to have a giant scratch disk for Photoshop. Trouble is, the wretched thing reports under 2Gig file space while 38

[filmscanners] RE: Multi-coloured lines in images...

2002-02-12 Thread John&#x27;s ntl account
So you don't like it? << and the final sentence is ... not repairable , frow it in the GARBAGE ! ... (and actually the TRASH is the PROPER PLACE for THIS HP STUFF !) ... I have been ripped following the ads of HP and is reputation (quite amazing how this kind of brand can have such a reputation