The artixscan 4000 tf has the same light source as the Polaroid 4000 and
4000 plus units. I am not sure about the others
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Maurice Rickard
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:25 PM
To: Kapetanakis, Constantine
Please forward any questions relative to the Polaroid scanner to :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 11:49 AM
To: Kapetanakis, Constantine
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Old
The specification on misregistration for the ss120 is 2 pixels maximum. It
is not an easy measurement to make. having a 3 pixel misregistration should
result in a fairly obvious image defect.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2
The pc version of Dust and Scratch removal is available now. The Mac version
should be available in approximately 2 months
-Original Message-
From: Bernie Kubiak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 10:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Color Mi
No it will not damage the scanner . I have done this many times myself.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 6:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] SS4000 Plus film ejection
I have an SS4000 Plus scanner (s
The ss4000 does have a SCSI termination switch.
-Original Message-
From: Austin Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 4:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Which SCSI Card for SS4000
Hi Tom,
Possibly termination? I don't remember, but
set for scanner testing, all of you would be using the same standard,
and your numbers would be comparable.
I still maintain that this can be done, and at miniscule cost to the
manufacturers of scanners. (compared to your advertising budgets, that is!)
Guy
-Original Message-
From: Kapetanak
Geia sou Vasili,
Your problem is with Photoshop. Newer versions of Photoshop allow some
filters and functions to work with 48 bit images.
The only way around that is to convert to 8-bit
Costas
-Original Message-
From: VC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:29 AM
To:
I agree as well. We have a Umax Powerlock III in the lab and are using it
as an intergral part of a piece of test equipment for measuring film
resolution/MTFetc. Good choice
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:43 AM
To: [
That's correct. 48 bits is 16 x 3 (for RGB). However, i don't know of any
desktop scanner that gives you 16 bits per color. The Niko 4000ED, Polaroid
Sprintscan 4000+, SS45 Ultra SS120 all give you 14 bits and of course the
higher the bit count the better the dynamic range of the scanner (
theoret
I could be that the light source is deteriotating over time and the CCD is
trying to compensate by increasing the gain. This of couse would be true if
you did not have streaks initially.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Atkielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:2
11 matches
Mail list logo
