I'm running NT4 SP6a, dual 850MHz PIII, 512MB. Reliability: it gets used
for about 3 hours a day, five days a week on average and I think I've
had about 2 blue screens in the last year. Oh, Minolta Scan Speed by the
way.
Mark
>
>Obscanning - I wonder how many of those using Windows with filmscan
Hello folks,
Although this isn't strictly a scanning issue, I suspect other list members
have thought about this as well and adopted solutions.
Basically, I am looking for a long term (20 years+) storage medium to
archive my scans on. I don't have faith in CDR and tapes are also prone to
long te
Please can someone throw some light on this for me. My Minolta ScanSpeed
software has a setting for 16 bit or 16 bit linear colour depth but the help
file doesn't give any indication of exactly what the difference is. I'd
really like to understand what the difference is and why you should use one
Hi all,
Is this possible and is my logic correct?
I am reasoning that the output from the actual scanner hardware is always
going to be in the same range of digital values irrespective of what
adjustments are made in the scanner software (apart from resolution of
course). Therefore, is it possib
Yes, one of the reasons behind me asking the question. The Minolta software
is fine for simple adjustments but only enables you to preview on small
lo-res scans. I'd much rather work on the full scan in something like
Photopaint (What?! someone who doesn't use Photoshop and actually likes
Photopai
First off, my thanks for all the replies and the interesting view points. I
was hoping there might be some de-facto standard out there but obviously
not!
I'd just like to answer some suggestions:
1. Use Film
Yes, fine if your film was developed properly in the first place but I have
some negati
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Kersenbrock
> P.S - Magazines like P.C. Magazine has done benchmarking of
> servers using IDE vs
> SCSI disks, and I recall their conclusions to be that they
> were very surprised to
>
Because, (if my understanding is correct), the RAID card improves over
normal SCSI error correction (1 bit) and ups this to 4 bit. It is nothing to
do with RAID parity.
Mark
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Ross
> Sent: 11 Decem
FWIW, I protect my system with an APC SmartUPS 1000 and with everything
running (including scanner, modem, printer and speakers), it is running at
about 50% load. I also have a four way block hanging off one of the rear
outlets and have had no problems with it. Cons? The PowerChute software
someti
I can confirm the 2GB split between OS and App RAM. It is something to
do with the Alpha port of NT I think and to keep things consistent for
the coders, Microsoft translated the Alpha restriction to the Pentium
version. I believe W2K has the same problem but I don't think there is
an Alpha port o
10 matches
Mail list logo
