Melba in Korea wrote:
> I have been reading up on the Nikon LS2000 and the Polaroid
> Sprintscan 4000. The more I read the more confused I get. The
> Nikon has low resolution compared to the Polaroid, but comes
> with Digital Ice and Altamira Genuine Fractals(which is
> supposed to enlarge a 35mm photo to billboard size. Any
> comments on either machines performance would be greatly
> appreciated.
If it is your business to make a lot of very good quality scans
from slides and negatives that have had less than stellar care,
the Nikon is the way to go. The Nikon also had the edge in
color correction when working with Photoshop, although I'm
not sure this is the case any more.
If you want to wring every bit of information possible from a
35mm exposure without spending $10,000 (U.S), get the
Polaroid.
_________________________________________
Hawaiian Astronomical Society
http://www.hawastsoc.org
====================================================================
The filmscanners mailing list is hosted by http://www.halftone.co.uk
To resign, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS in the
title, or UNSUBSCRIBE FILMSCANNERS_DIGEST if you are reading the Digest.
