Try this:
Device tab: Media Type: Image
Color Tab: Color Balance: None
Preben
From: Conor Twomey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
Just a quick question, has anybody tried to scan in
cross-processed
negatives using Vuescan ?
Everytime I scan them in the software seems to colour
correct to give an
My files are ordered in a geographical folder hierarchy:
i.e: europe/southern europe/italy/rome/cityscapes
Does anyone know how to batch process (image size, tiff to jpeg, etc.) the
whole hierarchy and save the results into the same hierarchy(overwriting the
original files) or into an identical
Hi Mike,
Thank you for a very useful tip. It will do what I want - and more!
Greetings Preben
- Original Message -
From: Mike Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 7:45 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Batch processing, but keeping same
- Original Message -
From: Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 6:59 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Re:Digital PIC
With all due respect, you are wrong for once...
Once? You haven't been around long, eh? ;-)
The newest LF digital
- Original Message -
From: Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should we then abandon film and go back to glass plates???
Film NEEDS to be flexible, at least for 35mm and MF, as it rolls up. It is
also held flat (as can be) with a pressure plate. A CCD does NOT need, or
want to be,
Art wrote:
I'm still waiting for the reusable film that can be recharged after the
images are taken off of it.
Preben wrote
Art, do you mean almost like a digital camera? :-)
Preben
Art wrote:
snip
I haven't yet found a media card that stores the equivalent of 7400
megabytes
Art,
My previous answer crossed your message below, sorry about that.
Ok, lets suppose that we got re-usable film tomorrow: How would you store
the images after you have taken them off the film at 200MB each - in
order to re-use it?
Also, at what price do you think a re-useable film would
Thomas,
Thank you for an interesting technique and the insight on Kodachromes...
Preben
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 8:40 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] depth of focus in scanners old Kodachromes
I scan
I'm still waiting for the reusable film that can be recharged after the
images are taken off of it.
Art, do you mean almost like a digital camera? :-)
Preben
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
- Original Message -
From: Simon Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
Now, given the recent price reductions, for another £1,000 more than the
competition, I can't see any reason to consider any other scanner over the
Flextight. I am always open to contrary views though, and if anyone can
If the only symptom is a reduced light output, perhaps you can compensate
with the lamp setting under options, special ?
Preben
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 1:59 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] SprintScan 4000
(but it was new)
Two days ago I bought a new 2400dpi flatbed scanner for not much more
than the 250UK pounds which HP wanted just to look at my Officejet.
Ian
- Original Message -
From: Preben S. Kristensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 11:40 PM
Subject
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I therefore propose a few revisions to the list charter.
(1)On Mondays, Tuesdays and Thursdays, list discussion. cut
Tony,
Are these times GMT based?
Also, would it not be a good idea for you to be able to remote-zap
offenders' hard
and Digital PIC our new process for scanning exposed undeveloped film.
Jack,
This sounds interesting, but how will it work??
Preben
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe
Has anybody on the list tried the JPEG2000 file compression.
Preben
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the
Dan,
This is such a common thing to happen that it must be considered a design
fault - and I think that replacement holders should be offered for free or
at a particular low price (cost price?) by Polaroid - after all, it's a
piece of plastic - what say, David??
That not being the case:
I
16 matches
Mail list logo
