"Colin Maddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Anyone want to buy a 32MB NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 4X AGPGraphics Card???
> You said you were getting rid of this card to replace it with a two head
one, as I
> remember, but otherwise would you recommend the GeForce2 MX card, from
> some manufacturer or ano
"Ramesh Kumar_C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think one year back Microsoft stopped support to Alpha.
> There is no Win2000 on Alpha.
NT4 runs nicely on Alpha, but no colour management.
Rob
Ed wrote:
> I don't run a business or NT workstations and already run WinMe, which to
my
> understanding is the consumer version of Windows 2000 Professional.
No, the two products aren't really related that way. ME is an upgrade of
Win98SE,
and Win2K is an upgrade of NT4.
> My point was that ma
a much more stable kernel)
o Designed for heavy duty apps
It's more useful to professionals, and should run things like Photoshop
better than other versions of Windows (should may be the operative word).
The reliability of NT/Win2K is amazing as far as uptime is concerned.
Rob
Rob Geraght
"IronWorks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok - I was confused. I was referring to 100 MHz DIMMs v. 133 MHz DIMMs.
I
> take it Win2K works fine with 100 MHz DIMMs?
Win2K doesn't care what the front side (memory) bus speed is. It just runs
faster with a faster bus.
Rob
"Quoton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> down any more. However, Photoshop (5.5) is noticeably slower on Win2k than
Win98.
> My guess is that PS is a 16 bit program optimized under 16 bit OS such as
Win98.
> But Win2k is a 32 bit OS.
Odd. I thought PS5.5 and later were optimised for dual processors
l and other chip
manufacturers. ;)
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
well buying used, if
> you know what you are looking for.
Again, this assumes a lot. It's a big world, and the way it looks from
where you're sitting isn't how it is for a lot of other people.
This discussion is a little irrelevent anyway - Ed Hamrick is the author
of the software and it's his choice who he wants to support and how.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
Jules wrote:
>is the prescan in NikonScan just a scan? it's seems awful fast, even faster
>than the fastest vuescan preview.
AFAIK it's a low resolution scan just like the Vuescan preview scan.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
DMA capable drives,
etc. Those issues aren't really important in interface design - the hardware
is largely transparent to the software as far as the Windows display is
concerned.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
s who don't do image editing
for a living, or don't have the money to spend on high end
hardware. There's a lot of folks with film scanners who
aren't professional photographers or graphic artists.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
Colin wrote:
>Rob Geraghty wrote:
>>anyone using vuescan would surely be using Photoshop or PSP, both of
>>which are unworkable in 640x480.
> Unworkable? I'm using PS at 640 x 480 (and using Vuescan) and
> both work fine.
Sorry, I didn't mean to say they *wouldn&#
"Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Subject: RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K?
> Does is manage color like W98SE?
Just in case it hasn't been stated clearly, Win98SE, WinME and Win2K all
use the same colour management sy
"Hersch Nitikman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This time you are wrong, Frank. I'm sure there are more than a couple of
us
> with 17" monitors. With a 17", anything over 800x600 is dysfunctional. I'm
> happy for you that you have something larger, but please don't penalize
all
> of us who don't ha
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just traced the scsi commands that NikonScan 3.0 uses
> with the LS-30, and it probably will get the same jaggies
> as in NikonScan 2.5. It reads scan lines in 64K buffers,
> which is what causes the jaggies.
> I already told my Nikon contact about how to fix the
>
igital ROC
>with the LS-30 (but it does with the LS-40).
Does it get jaggies?
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
I mentioned
earlier, a much more important consideration would be
processor speed and disk drive speed. RAID and fast
drives would be essential to avoid waiting for ages
just to load and save files. Using different spindles
for the OS, working files and scratch space would
probably help.
Ro
"PAUL GRAHAM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mac OS only allows a max of 1Gb Ram to any one programme (eg Photoshop),
> does Windows 2000 have similar memory limits? (noticed some of the newest
> Windows motherboards can take 3Gb+ in RAM)
Your main problem will be finding motherboards that support
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem with this is two-fold - clicking in the
> middle of the crop box already moves the crop box,
> and dragging the image only lets you move it one
> screen at a time (scroll bars give you quick scrolling
> anywhere within the image).
I for one would prefer th
"Hersch Nitikman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote re the abort button:
> I find I have to hit it 2 or 3 times before it takes effect.
I suspect this is more to do with how well the scanner responds to
an abort instruction while scanning than vuescan itself.
Rob
box.
If you make a mistake anywhere in the directory structure, a
new structure with the error in it will be created. The common
dialog box only creates one level at a time.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
the crop box, but it means I end up taking a lot longer
to set it than in say the HP TWAIN interface or Nikonscan, where I simply
click on a corner and drag over the region I want.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
cx, 137KB).
The common dialog box also allows you to create directories in the process
of creating the path, which is very handy.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
ce it makes to do one,
the other or both.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
"shAf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I realized for my LS-2000 Coolscan, the 2nd pass would not
> properly register with the 1st ... bummer!! ...
Huh? How come, Michael?? I've *never* had registration problems
with my LS30. :-7
Rob
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a message dated 3/3/2001 1:31:55 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> > This is after vuescan gets it and does a conversion from the sRGB
provided
> > from the scanner.
> Yes, VueScan transfers the raw samples as linear samples
> (i.e. not gamma corrected) using the
"Arthur Entlich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Phil Edmunston, the author of Lemonade, suggests never buying a newly
> designed car in the first year.
Bear in mind most models are tested on the Japanese market before being
released elsewhere. This is true of many Japanese manufacturers. It's a
*
"Shough, Dean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Most camera stores that carry professional equipment should carry the
Q60s.
> If not, they can order it for you.
Dean, I mentioned it for the benefit of folks outside the USA. Kodak
Australia disavows any knowledge of the existance of the Q60. I seem to
rec
FYI I just noticed that Praxisoft are selling the Q60 - for those like me
who haven't been able to source it anywhere.
http://www.praxisoft.com/buy/index.html
Rob
brand entirely. The main thing I want it
for is profiling so I can match the output from my Epson 1160 to the output
from my LS30 film scanner (see it's not OT after all :). Since it's for
profiling, the gamut really needs to be more than sRGB.
Thanks in advance,
Rob
Rob Geraghty [
nter dithering or error diffusion is not the same
as classical offset screening. ISTM that people are stuck on offset screening
as being the only valid definition of halftoning.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
eurat and it's amazing. Personally
I prefer Renoir, Monet and Toulouse-Lautrec however. :)
Obscanning: IMO pointillism is more analagous to a computer video display
than haltoning, but I understand the point. :)
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
"Austin Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Both my Epson printers (3000 and 1160) have a 'halftone' setting, as well
as
> my QMS laser printer...so both of them certainly believe they are
> 'halftoning'.
Does anyone actually use the "halftone" settings on their Epson?
Rob
ed using the "-" setting on the paper thickness lever. I
would *not* advise using the "thin" paper setting for photo thickness paper.
You could damage the printer transport, or at least increase wear on the
head. The lever should be set to "+" for all photo paper t
"Gordon Tassi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rob: Regarding the jaggies: I have 2.5.1 and find that Nikon's LS-30
output
> at 1350 dpi has jaggies and Vuescan's 2700 output from the same machine
has
> none. It seems to be a question of output resolution.
Ed and others (Tony I think for example)
"Tony Sleep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have grave reservations about recommending any of those scanners for
this
> use. IME Nikons are marginally worse due to their semi-collimated
lightsource.
I have an LS30 (the Nikon mentioned earlier) and would definitely agree.
I'm not very impressed wi
I have had a couple of responses from Nikon. Basically they are claiming
that BIOS 1.31 and Nikonscan 2.51 fix the problem. I checked, and ALL the
people who wrote to me (ten users of both the LS30 and LS2000) had jaggies
with 1.31 and 2.51. I have said as much as a response to Nikon.
So they
itself is *not* totally invisible in
IR. I don't know what the reasons are, but on my Nikon LS30 both ICE and
Vuescan's dust removal components soften the image slightly overall (ICE
more than Vuescan at the lower settings of Vuescan).
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
Art wrote:
>Meet my brothers, Art, Art, and Art, my sons, Art and Art and my
>daughter Artina.
"Is your name not Art? That's going to cause a bit of confusion. Mind
if we call you Art just to keep it clear?"
Art
(sort of)
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
floppy (using packet technology).
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
e PC, and I've tried it in horizontal and vertical orientations.
Makes no difference. Unless I use Vuescan, I get jaggies. The problem
is Nikonscan, not where the scanner is sitting.
Rob
(but I wouldn't recommend putting any film scanner where it will suffer
a lot of vibration)
"IronWorks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am short on desk space - can I set the scanner on my PC Minitower box
> which is sitting on the floor?
The only concerns I can think of would be dust being closer to the floor,
and vibration from the fans/drives in the tower.
Rob
"Terry Carroll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Me, too. I wish there was a way of running scandisk on a CDR.
Someone mentioned a tool previously on this list that does binary file
compares recursively, but I don't remember the name. If you are
writing a single directory to CDR, it's easy to do a
"Jack Phipps" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you do a scan using the Nikon interface do you have the "CleanImage"
> (Nikon's old name for Digital ICE) in the "Mode: On (Sharpen)" or "Mode:
On
> (Normal)"? The mode Nikon calls "Mode: On (Normal)" actually blurs the
image
> slightly. You should r
"Doug Herr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 2/16/01 5:03 PM, Berry Ives at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I just bought a Scan Dual II but have not set it up yet. Hope to do so
this
> > weekend. I have a Mac, so Vuescan is not available for me. I'll make
some
> > comments after I have some experi
"Jack Phipps" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Digital ICE from Applied Science Fiction should not soften the image.
Jack, are you talking about the current version of ICE, or the version
implemented on the Nikon LS30, LS2000 and Minolta Scan Elite?
If you're talking about the new version we'll have
"John Matturri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Related: why in general does Ice-based dust removal soften the image.
> The purpose of the IR channel is to identify the particular spots that
> are dust / scratches. Shouldn't the software only affect those areas
> leaving the rest of the image alone a
"Bob Shomler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One could go back and try dust removal using Vuescan 6.5
> (or some release before 6.6, which is when the film grain reduction was
added to vuescan).
I still have several versions prior to 6.6. I'll see if I can give it a go.
Rob
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree that ICE (or similar) might be very useful if you have limited
> time-per-image, or lots of really dusty, scratched, or mould-damaged
film -
> but I haven't, and I don't find myself wishing for ICE..
Speaking as another Ozzie, I have a limited amount of time f
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But ONLY if [vuescan] doesn't soften my image as much as your samples
indicate..
I think most of the softening is the dust removal algorithms at higher
settings,
but it's hard to know. Only separating the features would make it possible
to tell.
Rob
>Educational User Licensing Agreement?
EULA = End User License Agreement. ie the agreement between the software
vendor and the purchaser of the software.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
"Arthur Entlich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just read in a Fuji publication that they have released an improved
> > Provia 100F, with better flesh tones and pushability.
Geeze, the one I've been using has been amazing. I wonder when the
new one will arrive in Australia?
Rob
t
> solution (price and resolution wise)?
>As anybody tested the Epson 1640 Photo?
I think you would be disappointed with the sharpness
and shadow detail from the flatbed. They are fine for
scanning prints, but for scanning film, a film scanner
does a better job.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
utputs?
Yes. The scanner hardware actually has a 12bit A/D, which the LS30 firmware
hobbles to 10bits per channel. Nikonscan only outputs 8bits per channel,
but Vuescan is able to access the 10bits the firmware allows.
The *scanner* outputs 10 bits per channel. Only *Nikonscan* cuts it down
to 8
"Alan Tyson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So JASC could alter their import routine, but PSP still
> wouldn't be able to write a 48-bit image, so there's not a
> lot of point in it. I have quite enough trouble with 24-bit
> myself, so I'm happy with PSP7.
At least you could read the file. Of cour
d a 48bit uncompressed
file? I'll have to try it. I'll try raising the issue
with JASC.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
"Alan Tyson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PSP7 only works with 24-bit images, however, and only
> uncompressed tifs.
Huh? PSP7 (and all the versions I've used) supports LZW
compressed TIFF. It *doesn't* support 48bit TIFFs, at
least not in the format exported from Vuescan.
Actually I think ther
ting in your email program and send messages
in plain text. The people who receive the digest version of the list get
HTML as a heap of unreadable tags.
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
"John C. Jernigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Art, Rob, et al,
> Have you, or any others, any experience with the Olympus P-400 dye sub?
> The samples I've seen are superb and can print (almost ) 8x10.
Not I, but then the reason I just bought an 1160 was to get to A3. :)
Rob
"Alan Womack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now I did get WAY too much saturation and did have to back off the red a
bit in PS.
I don't think I've ever scanned anything in Vuescan which had too much
saturation!
(but maybe I like oversaturated images ;)
Rob
"Tom Christiansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In short: How does the gamma setting affect the output when the image is
> printed out on paper? Should I have two different files: One with gamma=1
> for printing, and one with gamma=2.2 for web publishing?
Best to ask this on the Epson inkjet list
> Arthur Entlich wrote:
[stuff about dye sub]
There seemed to be stuff on the Epson list that dye sub prints may not last
as long as pigment based inkjet prints. Anyone have any ideas on dye sub
longevity?
Rob
Maybe this is a selfish suggestion as I think it may only be useful with
Nikon scanners - how about a checkbox to automatically eject the film after
scanning the last frame on a strip? When batch scanning this would be nice,
as it means the film ejects automatically and doesn't spend too much tim
> Just out of old fashioned curiosity: What does the K in CMYK stand for?
The word used in the printing industry and photography is Key, but thinkof
it as the K in blacK. The B was already taken by Blue, so they used K for
Key/blacK. Now if someone wants to remind me what the origin of the word
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 11:53 AM 02-02-01, Laurie Solomon wrote:
> >(3) Inkjets have reached the level where there quality and other
features
> >come very close to those, if not in some instances surpass those, of
> >inkjets.
> ?? Am I reading this wrong, it doesn't make sense to me.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Changed the "Restore colors", "Clean" and "Sharpen"
> options to only change the scan, not the preview.
Why this change, Ed? I'd have thought that it made sense for the preview to
show the net effect of all the selected filters, especially the "restore
colour
huge
amount *less* than without any kind of automatic restoration.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
"Chris McBrien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zoom shut down after being on a tripod in -2°C. air for twenty
> minutes. I had to rely on the 23 year old 35mm. Minolta.
Sometimes there's a lot to be said for analogue technology. :)
Rob
(batteries not included)
I happened to try scanning an old (circa 1980) kodak 100 print neg the other
day using both vuescan and nikonscan. The colours have badly faded in the
neg, and it was really badly scratched by the squeeze plate in the camera
(an ancient 2nd hand Voigtlander). When I heard that Ed had introduced
> It looks like a polarizing effect to me. Personally I don't use polarizers
> with wide angle lenses with lots of sky in the image because I don't like
> the effect. It's probably an individual thing. Great picture otherwise.
Thanks! I guess I'm just a sucker for saturated colours. ;)
Rob
"Austin Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One other thing that just occurred to me: aren't there three
> > or four pixels on the CCD for each actual pixel seen in the image?
> Yes. That is only for color information though, not for edge information.
Except with the Nikon scanners that AFA
toring colour images which I may want to edit.
If I am making graphics for a web site, photos become jpegs, and line drawings
or text become GIFs. The most compact format for web display of B&W photos
is greyscale jpeg.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
camera did you use?..
> was it a lens with a T-adapter?
Pentax MZ5, Sigma 28-80 AF zoom, Hoya circular PL.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
ides. The 300dpi from my Scanjet 3c
(or even bumped to 600dpi) wasn't clean enough to give good results.
It also helped if I used the scanner at night with the room lights
off!!
>>and I have bought a Nikon LS-30.
A *way* better solution. :)
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
made by HP for their
flatbeds. It works, but the results were very
poor on the scanners I tested. OK for web use
only, useless for printing or more than 80x600
resolution.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
hear of the origin of the word.
Rob
PS Other shots taken with a simple UV filter don't
show the same variations in the sky, so it's not
a fault in the camera lens.
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
an, but very
recent versions didn't seem to do much with scratch removal. Do the new
algorithms you're using have much of an effect on scratches?
(I have a lot of negs badly abused by photo labs)
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
Apologies to those who are using the digest, because the attached picture
will appear as encoded ascii. A while back I was in touch with a guy from a
stock photo company and I sent a low res jpeg of a photo of mine, which he
claimed showed vignetting. Now to me, vignetting in the camera is cause
Hersch wrote:
> Wouldn't it make sense, if going away for an extended period, to remove
the
> cartridge? Or am I missing something here?
Removing the cart won't flush the heads. You have to use a cleaning cart to
flush the heads, or the ink still in the lines and head itself could dry and
block
nk) 2700dpi. You may need to do some
sharpening after scanning though.
Have you tried Vuescan?
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
ay to get CDs back requires a
lot less effort. I've spent enough sleepless nights feeding my scanner
already!
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
Paul wrote:
[snipped stuff about Macs which I can't comment on]
> I would also like to know more about filmscanners. Of the ones I've
> considered, the new Nikon Coolscan IV ED USB filmscanner is my favorite.
> However, at $895.00, the price is a bit high for a photo hobbyist.
[snip] How good is
nobody felt
they were getting any support, and Nikon gives no indication
of intentions to fix it.
> Finally, if you are scanning black and white film,
> you should not use it all.
*IF* the film is non-chromogenic. ICE works fine with XP2
or T400CN. But it certainly won't work with traditional
silver based B&W films.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
turn off the cleaning filters
it goes away? I haven't tried the feature since I saw the bug.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
arty inks
>>voids the warranty as far as anything to do with the ink flow is
>>concerned.
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
e Nikonscan and ICE is with the factory default settings,
it's worthless.
I agree with Michael though - we know nothing about the new
scanners. They may be wonderful, or they may have hassles
of their own. Don't forget that 4000dpi scans are huge and
you'll need LOTS of RAM a
much more dense, I think this is the reason why the brightness
needs to be changed - and changed a LOT for really fine grained slides.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
ere at present.
> Would I notice a big improvement?
Was the Stylus 600 720x720dpi or 1440x720? On Epson Photo
paper you'd probably see a lot less banding and dithering.
See if you can get a sample from a 760, 860 or 1160 (same
print head).
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
"Hart or Mary Jo Corbett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for clearing away the fog, so to speak! What you say certainly
> sounds logical to my unscientific mind. Gives me something more to think
> about. It's looking like I'll have to wait a few more years, if possible,
> before a good arc
"Robert DeCandido" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You do not void your warranty by using third party inks in an
> Epson. If you need to return the printer for servicing, just remove
> the CIS and re-install the Epson cartridges. See the Inkjetmall web
> site (Cone Peizography, eg) for a discussion
"Hersch Nitikman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about the 860/1160 with 3rd party archival inks? Aren't they much
less
> costly than the 2000P? Or, what am I missing?
Rob wrote:
>> AFAIK the 2000P is the *only* printer Epson make with OEM pigment
>> based inks
Note "OEM" above. Yes, you can
"Robert DeCandido" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not the 860 (the smaller version of the 1160)?
I don't think the 860 and 1160 print heads are identical. I'm pretty
sure that the 760 is the smaller version of the 1160. The 860 has
more black jets so it prints plain text faster. Either the 7
"Hart or Mary Jo Corbett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (1) My question pertains to B&W archival printing; apparently, the 2000P
> can't even do that. Is there any printer out there which can at fairly
high
> res? I'm used to sharp prints. [Prints not to exceed 8X10]
You might want to look at
"Hart or Mary Jo Corbett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Epson 7000, 7500 and 9000 all use archival inks and all claim 100 to
200
> years, per the Epson site [sprinkle on as much salt as you think is
> appropriate!!]
Pardon me. I should have said the only one in the realms of a dekstop
printer
Bill wrote:
> Same reply I received. Interestingly, the next day and today there is
> no evidence of the jaggies that were so obvious when I posted my
> query. It is not the power since I have everything connected to a UPS
> with line conditioning.
Try the same picture which gave you the probl
Below is the response I received from Nikon USA to my email query about
whether they plan to fix Nikonscan to eliminate jaggies:
=
Dear Rob Geraghty:
If there are jaggies this is not something that is normal. I would
elect to send the scanner in for service. We have not found
"Arthur Entlich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I realize this thread is somewhat off topic, but I have yet to see any
> samples of 2880 dpi Epson output at any store. Is there really any
> improvement over the 1440 dpi output? Does anyone know if the banding
> is lessened or increased with thi
"Hart or Mary Jo Corbett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's sure a long ways from the 100 to 200 years longevity that Epson was
> caliming on its Web site for it printers from the 2000P on up!
Presumably the new printer doesn't use pigment based inks. AFAIK the 2000P
is the *only* printer Epso
"Tony Sleep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps you shouldn't have tempted fate. New Epson : Stylus Pro 5500,
2880dpi, 3pl,
> Epson claim '20yrs light fast when mounted behind glass'. £2,495GBP tho'.
Ah, so they finally produced a 2880dpi replacement for the 5000. I wonder
if it
has separate i
heaper, good results, and can
use 3rd party archival inks.
Rob
PS I'm glad to hear you're happy with the 2000P, Frank, since
it seems to have received an unwarranted poor reputation on
the Epson inkjet list.
PPS Obscanning: what is the largest print anyone has made
from a 2700dpi scan?
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
601 - 700 of 1003 matches
Mail list logo
