Thanks, Tony, for doing what you can about the spam problem.
And please feel free to suggest what we might do to help make it less
of a problem.
It's actually only a very minor nuisance for me, but I have no idea
why that is, unless it's because I've been on Mac's and done what I
can to help thei
slides over the past couple of months
> and been very happy with the results, even though it's not a
> dedicated film scanner.
>
> -Rob
>
> On Jul 4, 2007, at 5:36 AM, Sam McCandless wrote:
>
>> I need a new film scanner, Robert, so I'm curious to know ho
On Jul 3, 2007, at 11:47 PM, R. Jackson wrote:
> On Jul 1, 2007, at 6:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> [snip]
>
> ... At 4800 dpi a 35mm scan is 6255x4079.
> That's over 25 megapixels. I can't really tell the difference between
> a 4800 dpi scan and a 6400 dpi scan, so I never go higher than 4
On Jun 17, 2007, at 3:03 PM, Henk de Jong wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
>> They misinformed you! I have one here and the front does not rotate
>> on the EF 50mm f1.4 USM, it simply extends and retracts a little.
> You are sure? That is good news!
>
> With kind regards,
> Henk de Jong
> --
> http://www.hsdej
Thanks, congratulations, and good luck, Tony.
We need your list, and it's good you saved it.
I'm looking forward to seeing it on the other side.
--
Sam
On May 31, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Tony Sleep wrote:
> [snip]
-
Welcome back to more active film shooting, Guy, and also to the Bay
area. Eight years ago, I moved from the Midwest back to the opposite,
northern side of the Bay (Sonoma), and I am delighted to be closer to
the eastern slope of the Sierras and, beyond there, to Nevada and
Utah. What light and what
to here than CanToo is. I have to look around.
--
Sam
>http://www.cantoo.com/PriceGuide0905.pdf
>I don't see it on their pricelist, but you can use Imacons here at $35
>or so an hour.
>
>Sam McCandless wrote:
>> Has anyone tried financing an Imacon by using it
>>
Yikes! Maybe instead I'll sell photo tours of
Utah's canyon country with the first stop at B&H
in New York. 8)
--
Sam
At 9:23 PM + 3/18/06, Paul Roberts wrote:
>
>> Did you mean to say 5000 dollars, instead of
>> pounds, Chris, or is that just here in the
>> States? I haven't looked hard
>Sam,
>
>1) where do you live?
In Northern California, Brad, north of San Francisco - in "the North
Bay" - whereas "Lists" and CanToo.com are in "the East Bay". I'm
guessing there's a quite small film-scanner market much more local to
me.
>And how much would you charge per 6X7 transparency or n
Has anyone tried financing an Imacon by using it
to scan others' film, presumably mostly
medium-format? Where I live, I don't think I'd
get much business, but it wouldn't take much to
encourage me to try.
>Yes, right the Plustek OpticFilm 7200 series has 7200dpi true optical
>resolution at <£2
Since Paul Segal is also from Toronto, Paul, might you see him at
Pikto and be able to pick his brains about the scanner(s) with which
his "near-digital-quality" workflow might begin? I'm curious to know
whether he's concerned about the type of light source. And which
scanner he would substitute f
At 2:57 PM -0500 2/26/06, Unspecified [in this case, Paul S. Nielsen] wrote:
>
>CCFT = Cold Cathode Flourescent Tube.
>Basically use a long (width of display) flourescent tube (or 2, one at top
>and one at bottom) and then use a funky shaped piece of plastic to
>distribute the light across the full
At 10:36 PM -0800 2/25/06, lists wrote:
>I used Moniserv in Hayward Ca to get the CRT going again. Most of their
>business is (don't laugh) CCFT replacement in LCD displays. I've never
>seen so many Apple Cinema displays in one place.
I'm curious to know what "CCFT" stands for even though the
rot
At 1:31 AM + 2/1/06, Tony Sleep wrote:
>
>[snip] Or use a mail client that allows you to quote selectively
>in the first place, eg Thunderbird with the Quickquote extension. [snip]
I'm guessing Thunderbird is Windows-only.
I'm on a Mac and still use Eudora. It lets me quote selectively, and
I
>[snip]
>For the same reason as most on this forum I'd always steered clear of LCD's
>until recently, when it became necessary to find something lighter to
>transport (getting old & arthritic.)
>
>After a lot of research, I settled on Dell's FP1905 and was quite surprised
>how good it is (I'd been
At 4:03 AM -0800 12/9/04, Arthur Entlich wrote:
>[snip]
>A small bit of technological information to perhaps clarify some issues.
>[big snip]
A nice explication, Art.
Did you not deal with DVD because you agree with Brad?
> > [snip]
>> I've been considering DVD's, but reading about the problem
I have a Polaroid 4000 (not Plus), Ed, and it seems to scan my old
slides, Fujichrome as well as Kodachrome, well, at least with the
LaserSoft SilverFast software. No bulk loader, though, at least not
as far as I know, and I wouldn't say it's fast either.
--
Sam
>I've been lurking in the group fo
17 matches
Mail list logo
