ere any contravening opinions out there, or
would I be better off scanning my negs with a Polaroid 120?
Thanks.
-- Victor Landweber
>I havent't put my hands on any filmscanner yet, I haven't seen any in action
>neither.
>That's why I have to ask this simple question:
>
stant coffeee...
You can download a fully-functional, time-limited trial version from
http://www.photodex.com. If you try it, please post your comments to the
list. Thanks.
-- Victor Landweber
At 10:25 PM 12/7/2001 -0500, Larry wrote:
>But does it rotate uncompressed files? That was the
. Its
contact-sheet maker is so fast and well designed as to make Photoshop's
similar capability seem laughable. It's extremely customizable, and many
functions are available via keyboard shortcuts.
Try it, and don't look back!
-- Victor Landweber
At 12:52 PM 12/7/2001 -0600, yo
David --
Look at: http://www.imaging-resource.com/SCAN/DSMP/DSMA.HTM
I'm still wondering about the LONG scan times for MF film at highest
resolution. The Minolta specs state a MUCH shorter time -- 230 seconds as I
recall. Could it be the slow Mac they were using at Image-Resource.com? Or
that
hanks!
-- Victor Landweber
cellent Nikon review appears below.
Thanks.
-- Victor Landweber
>RAFE WROTE:
> >Lest I come off as a shill for Nikon, here's my
> >summary on the Nikon 8000 ED, after three weeks
> >of fairly intense usage. There's a little bit
> >of ammo for Mr. Hemingw
low can they go?
-- Victor Landweber
V. Landweber
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone (510)841-7217
Polaroid 120 Users --
Rafe B. wrote a marvelous review of his experience with the Nikon 8000
(posted to FILMSCANNERS on 6/26/01). Can someone with a Polaroid 120 post
something comparable?
-- Victor Landweber
RAFE WROTE:
>Lest I come off as a shill for Nikon, here's my
>summary o
