On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Peter Marquis-Kyle wrote:
being in a postilion to do the same thing for the 35mm scanners - LS4000,
...don't you just love it when the spell checker does that? It just reminds me
how difficult it is to get good postilions these days.
___Since the invention of the
SNIP
Any filtering of this nature would not be done at the lens level. A
lens is an optical device, and the best thing it can do is accurately
translate everything it sees to the sensitive/recording layer. This is
what all lenses strive toward. If any type of resolution lowering were
to
Because the transistion from digital image to print is non trivial. It's
similar to the problems of printing negitives.
Lynn: I understand that the digital machines will also accept an image
that is given to them on a disk and that the machine can make the print
from it. Wouldn't this allow
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Moreno Polloni wrote:
Maxtor just came out with a 1,000 gig hard drive. That should cover it.
_ That is terrabull. ;^)
You must have meant 100gb.
Today is truly a bad day for extra zeros.
Yes, and we use the Never Twice the Same Color system also.
--
walter
That's the moon a long time ago we used to go there.
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, B.Rumary wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard wrote:
I seem to remember watching American Football for the first time in the UK
some time back
I've not been able to foolw the conversation. Has anyone used the 2740 Mac
driver for the scanwit and been happy with it?
I'm thinking of buying one but I want to be sure.
Rich
AFAIK no, but VueScan works.
But for 40 year storage JPEG's should be quite fine particually 4000
dpi high quality JPEGs, those found to be of importance can be
transfered to lossless formats and edited. If you can push something
forward that long with only the loss of one high quality JPEG
compression you are well ahead of
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Hemingway, David J wrote:
Ed,
I have been biting my tongue throughout this whole dust conversation but I
guess I am finally baited out. I have done actual scans on the scanner with
a LED light source and the SS4000. It was quite obvious to me that there was
considerably
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Paul Chefurka wrote:
Yep.
-Original Message-
From: Marvin Demuth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan and Occam's Razor
He paraphrases Sir
William's insight with the
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Dave King wrote:
You appear to have deduced the cause of the scratches that appear
using the feeder. The film strip holder is much better in every
aspect except convenience:)) The feeder also doesn't get the film
flat enough! In other words, it's 'one-hour' quality,
Given the propensity of scanners to make large files, eg, 35mm at 2700
with VueScan at 64 bits 50 meg *each*. OTOH I've seen pre orders being
taken for 24x writers. thought this might be of interest here.
at
http://www.us.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=70002669
TDK VeloCD 12x/10x/32x CD-RW
Dear Mr. Hamrick:
Is it necessary to rescan with infrared every time, IOW, when doing
multiple scans of the same film is it necessary to do an IR scan every
time?
With my ScanWit 2740 scanner it takes about 35 minutes to do a 16 pass
scan (including the 16 IR scans), with a 666* Pentium III and
12 matches
Mail list logo
