, as have
raster imaging applications, such as Photoshop.
Wire Moore
Actually, I'm blind. I was in despair until I found this photography hobby.
Now it's all that keeps me going...
Seriously, I mean 100 ppi sent to the printer, not a 100 pixel wide image! I
have standards.
...
OK, the truth is I have very low standards...
Oh, never mind. I shouldn't have said
I also feel the Imaging Resource scanner reviews are weak. The scanner
operator seems to have no consistent methodology, no particular depth of
understanding of how features relate to performance, 'corrections' or
adjustments are performed with the scanner interface that make no sense from
the
A minor point for future clarity:
Little b means bits. Big B means bytes.
When people write Mb (whether 11 or 12 for USB) they mean mega-bits.
My scanner, attached to my computer using a USB 11Mb/s interface (or is it
12Mb/s? I can never remember which) has such low resolution that a
the
underexposed color slide profile.
Would you explain what motivated this new profile and how it works so that I
can understand how to make best use of it?
Wire Moore
on 10/4/01 9:34 AM, Hemingway, David J at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
-Original Message-
From: Hemingway, David J
David,
Thanks for contributing to the list.
I have certainly noticed the green haze and am pleased--as I'm sure other
users will be--to see the profile adjustments. However, the Color Slide2
profile is not an overall improvement, in my opinion. If you can give back
the shadow color, the
Got the new profile (2b) and gave it a spin. I think it is clearly superior
the the stock Color Slide profile and recommend anyone using chromes with
SS4000 give it a try.
Thank you David.
Wire Moore
on 10/4/01 3:08 PM, Hemingway, David J at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You will have the shadow
on 10/2/01 4:30 PM, Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent objective review:
http://www.creativepro.com/printerfriendly/story/14539.html
It's like most reviews, the critical tone is overly neutral so as not to
offend purveyors, and so doesn't properly
No! Not any more so than anyone else in the industry. I read a quick post
claiming that the review was good and *objective*. I read it and thought:
this is the same sort of pay-the-bills purveyor-centered review that
typifies the industry reviewing of *everything* from cars to hi-fis, to
sporting
I'm not at all hostile to the 4000 ED. It's just a piece of gear.
I used a LS-2000 for a few years and found it to be very effective. I'm sure
the 4000 ED is an improvement. Bruce likes it; I think... ? I couldn't tell
from his review!
My intention was primarily to challenge someone else's
To those on Mac who want to use this new SS4000 profile you need to do two
things:
1) Place the profile in the folder
System Folder:Preferences:Polaroid IQA Profiles
2) change the creator/type information on the file using a utility like
Snitch or BatchTyper to be the same as the other profiles
There¹s a button next to the preview window that has an icon that's a grid
of little squares; near the calibration button. Works like Insight¹s
selector.
Wire
on 10/1/01 7:24 PM, Alan Eckert at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a dumb question: Polacolar Insight has a button to pick which frame
Silverfast 5 AI known bug:
To all SS4000/Silverfast 5 users: Be sure you are running the latest patch
for version 5 which fixes a major CMS options bug. The desired patch is not
necessarily V5.5 which is not a bug fix release and for which Laser Soft is
charging a fee. I got patch V5.2.0 r05.
. After seeing this, I upgraded
the scanner firmware to V1.40 but the problem persists ... need to talk to
Polaroid support.
Wire Moore
Not to mention the potential for generating static electricity which may be
detrimental on any CMOS electronics inside the unit.
Wire
on 9/20/01 2:50 PM, Austin Franklin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I rarely get dust spots in my SS4000. I probably do something
Polaroid would
recommend
15 matches
Mail list logo
