Yes! dICE is the culprit. I'd tried most settings before
posting but never turned off the ICE because the film is
rather dirty and scrathed.
As for David's suggestions,
it is scanned with the rotation glass holder, and I pref
er the setting as color neg in RGB mode.
Thanks to Lau
rie, David,
Hi List:
I'm facing problems scanning the Kodak 100TMX
black/white neg on the Nikon 8000, preview is somewhat o
k but not good, while the scan lost every detail, just bl
ack and white blotches, like severly solarized or that I
can't describe clearly in English. Please someone how to
cope with
Sony is the best and in some aspects are better than Barco. Unfortunately the
GDM-F500R is a disaster and Sony replaced it with the GDM-F520 quickly, nothing beats
this one for now (Barco is better in several aspects).
Sony will have 0.15mm dot pitch CRT display soon FYI.
JM Shen
Monitor 1
PC World (I got my copy just 2 hours ago) has some comments on DVD-RW and
DVD-RAM. Not enough info, IMO, but a start. DVD holds a lot of data (up to
14 MB). Down side: if it goes bad, you *lose* a lot of data!
AFAICT, there's no clear-cut winner for storage--maybe the answer is to
Excellent output can be
obtained via either procedure. Personally, the only difference that seems
still unresolved (to me, at least) is that of print permanence. And as long as
great looking results can be obtained from either method, I would choose the
one with greatest longevity.
That's
Sorry I'm not familiar with conventional chemical darkroom and planning to go directly
digital darkroom, with Nikon LS-8000ED, also I'm learning photography with few
experience. So if my question sounds stupid, just laugh.
Simply, will Digital output surpass the Conventional Chemical
