that there would be no
misunderstanding.
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 7:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Compact Cameras
As for bronzing, just print matte papers and it's
as well as printers employ RIPs.
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 8:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Compact Cameras
The next time I'm at the photo lab (which also has
Hi,
I know this question has been asked in the past (and slightly
off-topic) but times change so I'd thought I'd raise it again.
I recently read an article about a photographer who started
out with digital (Fujifilm S2 Pro) but then switched to
medium format for colour and to an Olympus XA
I work mostly in color, but I am interested to know where I might find a
comparison of Epson 2200 BW with Quadtone BW. I read a review once that
thought very highly of the 2200 BW. Does anyone think it would be
worthwhile to set up my old 1160 with Quadtone, rather than simply use the
2200?
My brother has the old XA, for many years now, and the Canon 350D, at about
30 oz with lens, must be about 4x the mass, and it isn't going to fit in
anybody's shirt pocket.
Berry
On 4/25/05 7:34 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J. Littleboy wrote
The small-sensor
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So my question is this: have digital compacts reached the stage yet where
they can give film compacts like the XA a run for their money on image
quality? I'd be interested in hearing any experiences list members may have
on this.
The small-sensor cameras have been
So my question is this: have digital compacts reached the stage yet where
they can give film compacts like the XA a run for their money on image
quality? I'd be interested in hearing any experiences list members may have
on this.
As far as I can tell, for pixel counts, yeah, they can. 8.2 MP is
While I do not usually engage in this sort of comparative reviewing of
products nor in the recommending of them, I will make two general
observations from my experiences, which need to be taken with a grain of
salt since they entail my biases and preferences.
First, even at today's stage in
You should check out the PeizographyBW Black and White inkjet printing
system from Jon Cone (and inkjetmall.com). It is really amazing. No
bronzing, no metemerism, no fading, rich deep black and long tonal
scale. It is really, really very good.
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
snip
First, even at
PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Compact Cameras
You should check out the PeizographyBW Black and White inkjet printing
system from Jon Cone (and inkjetmall.com). It is really amazing. No
bronzing, no metemerism, no fading, rich deep black and long
tonal scale. It is really, really very
: [filmscanners] Re: Compact Cameras
You should check out the PeizographyBW Black and White inkjet printing
system from Jon Cone (and inkjetmall.com). It is really amazing. No
bronzing, no metemerism, no fading, rich deep black and long
tonal scale. It is really, really very good.
LAURIE SOLOMON
Hi Laurie,
I am familiar with it and have heard good things about it from users; BUT
that is one of the sorts of things that I consider as the EXTRA WORK
required to remedy the issues I am speaking of. :-)
It's not an issue if you do a couple of things...as you touch on...
First, I believe
You should check out the PeizographyBW Black and White inkjet printing
system from Jon Cone (and inkjetmall.com). It is really amazing. No
bronzing, no metemerism, no fading, rich deep black and long tonal
scale. It is really, really very good.
Hi Lotusm50,
Do you have the original, or
and not the run of the mill
colors).
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 4:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Compact Cameras
I think the solution is to have BW ink in different levels
I have no dispute with anything you have said below.
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Austin Franklin
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 7:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Compact Cameras
Hi Laurie,
I am familiar
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm waiting for some company to release a really capable small digicam with
a decent APS sensor, a truly superb lens (maybe a prime in the 40mm equiv.
range) and I guess some kind of deluxe EVF. Optical RF based VF is probably
hoping for too much :-) I imagine something
).
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 4:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Compact Cameras
I think the solution is to have BW ink in different levels
of blackness
I had the original plug-in system, but I now have the current ICC system.
Austin Franklin wrote:
You should check out the PeizographyBW Black and White inkjet printing
system from Jon Cone (and inkjetmall.com). It is really amazing. No
bronzing, no metemerism, no fading, rich deep black and
.
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 7:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Compact Cameras
As for bronzing, just print matte papers and it's a non
issue. I have used EEM and Photo Rag
: [filmscanners] Re: Compact Cameras
The next time I'm at the photo lab (which also has a print
service), I'm going to pick their brain regarding RIPs versus
just using the print driver. It seems to me that software is
software, i.e. the RIP is just doing the processing outside
the computer, rather
20 matches
Mail list logo
