Tony,
Thanks for your response. The past day or so has been an education for me.
Initially, my concern was fueled by the fact that I needed some information
(cleaning my Polaroid SS4000) and the concern that it might not have been
available if I waited a little longer- that the list might have go
>2. It's still useful to have a dedicated reference forum in one place, for
>as long as there are filmscanners around. Even if traffic is negligible, it
>may be tomorrow that any of us needs the conduit to the expertise of
>others.
But if your analysis is correct and traffic is negligable because
Davis
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 7:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: List future
Tony,
Thanks for your response. The past day or so has been an education for me.
Initially, my concern was fueled by the fact that I needed some information
(cleaning my Polaroid SS4000
Brad Davis wrote:
> In part, because I much enjoyed reading the list when there was more
> activity, I asked if there was a way to get it moving again.
You seem to have done just that:)
Asking questions, or putting up points/observations for debate will do it.
Regards
Tony Sleep - http://www.h
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
> But if your analysis is correct and traffic is negligable because most of
> the knowledgable users have adequate knowledge and are using their older
> models of scanner and not keeping up with the newer models, then
> eventually
> there will not be a group of informed contr
Brad Davis wrote:
>
> As to what kind of list I would like in addition - I feel that I am most
> behind the curve on various programs for image processing. I use
> Photoshop
> CS, and while I find it very useful, I keep coming across comments that
> this
> or that software does some things (even
Tony,
I think we are on the same page; and I concur with many of your points. The
list has for the most part had balance and been self correcting without
heavy handed intervention on your part. The "arrow of time" typically goes
in a linear fashion; but time may not have that characteristic any
