I just received two copies of this email I posted, and am wondering if
others received more than one. I checked my 'sent mail' and it shows it
having only gone out once. I'm wondering if it is my mail server, or
something happening elsewhere.
I don't need everyone to reply, so if a few people
I have my scanner currently set to not do any software sharpening at
all. It is adjustable within its software driver. I prefer having
control over it in Photoshop, which appears to be more sophisticated.
The same with my little digital camera. I have it saving the images
(which are jpegged)
From: Arthur Entlich
I just received two copies of this email I posted, and am wondering if
others received more than one. I checked my 'sent mail' and it shows it
having only gone out once. I'm wondering if it is my mail server, or
something happening elsewhere.
I don't need everyone
What you are saying makes sense, in terms of the progressive unsharp
masking process, and indeed my own workflow sometimes includes this.
One of the reasons I came to this was because I found occasional
upsetting artifacts showing up once I had completed the manipulation and
compositing work when
: [filmscanners] Re: Sharpening after scanning (SS4000):
questionforArt
What you are saying makes sense, in terms of the progressive unsharp
masking process, and indeed my own workflow sometimes includes this.
One of the reasons I came to this was because I found occasional
upsetting artifacts
the initial
slight sharpening, or doing it post-scanning?
Stan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 6:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Sharpening after scanning (SS4000
