Apologize for this repost. Seem to have been "unsubscribed" somehow, and
don't know if my original post made it.
Les
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscrib
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:17:50 -0500, you wrote:
>Hello!
>
>On their site, and in their literature, Kodak extols the virtues of
>Supra for scanning. Does anyone have experience with this film? I like
>Fuji Superia a lot, but I do get some grain aliasing problems with the
>400 ISO, and VueScan doesn
>Hello!
>
>On their site, and in their literature, Kodak extols the virtues of
>Supra for scanning. Does anyone have experience with this film? I like
>Fuji Superia a lot, but I do get some grain aliasing problems with the
>400 ISO, and VueScan doesn't have a profile for it !
>
>I will shoot a fe
>Hello!
>
>On their site, and in their literature, Kodak extols the virtues of
>Supra for scanning. Does anyone have experience with this film? I like
>Fuji Superia a lot, but I do get some grain aliasing problems with the
>400 ISO, and VueScan doesn't have a profile for it !
>
>I will shoot a fe
Sorry, forgot to add that I scanned this with my Polaroid SS4000 RAW), then
had to work with it for awhile in Paint Shop Pro before achieving the final
image. Use a different scanner and you might well end up with a different
image, use a different approach in PSP (or PS for that matter) and the
Sorry, forgot to add that I scanned this with my Polaroid SS4000 RAW), then
had to work with it for awhile in Paint Shop Pro before achieving the final
image. Use a different scanner and you might well end up with a different
image, use a different approach in PSP (or PS for that matter) and the
Hi Les,
I haven't used it. I do recall some displeasure expressed over this
film some time back by people who were scanning it. Whether the success
depends upon the operator, the film speed and grain size, or even the
scanner in question (lighting source, optics, or resolution (DPI/LPI)) I
don'
>
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 8:48 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Supra for scanning?
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanne
>Hi Tris,
>
>I've been using Supra 100 and 400 for scanning with my Nikon 4000ED, which
>seems to particularly sensitive to grain/grain aliasing. I've found the
>grain to be more than I desire. Some members of this list have recommended
>slightly overexposing negative film by 1/3 to 1/2 stop.
Supra is really easy to scan with Vs. Never had the shadow of a pb with it.
I used 400 and 800. Great range, grain is more than correct. No aliasing at
2400dpi.
Another yhing is how you'll like the color and tonal rendition of this film.
I personnally prefer Portra NC, which I find more subtile,
day, February 25, 2002 1:30 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Supra for scanning?
I personnally prefer Portra NC, which I find more subtile, (and less
"universal"), but that's matter of personal taste
11 matches
Mail list logo
