> From: Anthony Atkielski
>
> Both [Frontpage and Dreamweaver] generate garbage that passes for
> HTML. It is almost impossible to pick
> apart if you ever want to modify it yourself, and I think they
> designed the software to make it that way deliberately.
As long as it produces the correct re
] RE: Web home page writing software
Much of what you say is true, but I have to take issue with one thing.
Writing in HTML is equivalent to programming in assembly language. If all
you want is a small web site, with no dynamically generated content, then
write in HTML, and manually find and fix the
Paul writes:
> As long as it produces the correct results in
> a web browser, who cares?
True, but it won't. The junk generated by web-design software contains
mountains of code, often lots of scripting as well, and if you don't change
it carefully, it will break; the results will _not_ display
> -Original Message-
> If you want even a medium-sized
> web site, then you'd be crazy to do it in plain HTML, because the
> amount of
> repetitive typing would be prohibitive, and the number of needless bugs
> would be enormous.
Well, I write my own HTML and scripts BECAUSE I want to r
Alex
When it comes to doing the html don't use FrontPage... it's really crap...
use Dreamweaver MX but that's several hundred dollars... there are a number
of free html editors out there which are pretty good one that comes to
mind is 1st Page 2000 by Evrsoft... you can download it at www
SD writes:
> ... notepad is the best... but is it worth
> th hassle and the learning curve? Doubt it ...
There is no hassle. It takes a few hours to get used to writing HTML. You
can learn it in an afternoon.
Learning Dreamweaver might take days or weeks. And the cost of a full copy
of Drea
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony Atkielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:54 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Web home page writing software
> SD writes:
>> ... notepad is the best... but is it worth
>
Paul writes:
> But look at most professional web sites. They're
> full of nested tables, not to mention frames, plus
> little fragments of javascript for special
> effects, hit counters, etc.
No, they are not. Professional sites contain only the HTML required to do
the job; amateur sites and wa
can post
it.
Julie
http://www.lightdrawing.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony Atkielski
Sent: 30 July 2002 23:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Web home page writing software
Notepad is the best tool for building a Web
]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Web home page writing software
Paul writes:
> But look at most professional web sites. They're
> full of nested tables, not to mention frames, plus
> little fragments of javascript for special
> effects, hit counters, etc.
No, they are not. Professio
> I've added some Javascript to all my pages to prevent people saving the
> images by right clicking 'Save picture as'. This works on Internet Explorer
> and the Netscape on Windows. I haven't tested this on a Mac, if anyone could
> let me know if it works. If people are interested in the code, I
11 matches
Mail list logo
