[filmscanners] Re: [filmscanners_Digest] hi bit

2003-09-22 Thread Andreas Siegert
Hi Tom, >>Why are high bit worksflows harder and take more time? Because of the >>Photoshop limitations? Wouldn't a 16bit clean program relieve you of these >>hassles? > > Hello afx, I think the slowness is primarily due to the glacial speed that > the scanner transfers data to the computer. Somet

[filmscanners] RE: [filmscanners_Digest] hi bit

2003-09-21 Thread Austin Franklin
Hi Tom, > Hello afx, I think the slowness is primarily due to the glacial speed that > the scanner transfers data to the computer. Unless you have a really old scanner that uses a parallel or serial port, I'd doubt that the issue is data transfer from the scanner to the computer. Typically, it is

[filmscanners] Re: [filmscanners_Digest] hi bit

2003-09-21 Thread Bob Frost
Tom, PS can! Use levels to make the image darker (or lighter), and then use history brush to burn (or dodge) with opacity control. Simple! Bob Frost. - Original Message - From: "HPA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I wish i knew of a program that allowed dodging/burning in 16 bit, do you? ---

[filmscanners] Re: [filmscanners_Digest] hi bit

2003-09-21 Thread HPA
>> in excellent condition. Hi bit workflows are much harder to do, take far >> more time, and use more storage space. However learning them can improve > Why are high bit worksflows harder and take more time? Because of the > Photoshop limitations? Wouldn't a 16bit clean program relieve you of t